IBJNews

New doc lifts Community breast biz

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Community Health Network wooed Dr. Robert J. Goulet Jr. away from the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center to join its breast-surgery team. The move fits nicely with Community’s focus on breast-care services and the economics of health care.

Goulet, not to be confused with the star of Broadway musicals, had been medical director of the breast-care and -research center at the IU Simon Cancer Center. In his new role, Goulet will open an office this month on the campus of Community Hospital East.

Community already has five breast surgeons at its two other Indianapolis hospitals—in Castleton and just north of Greenwood.

“Bringing Bob in has brought a lot of attention to the breast-care program,” said Dr. Chace Lottich, medical director of Community Breast Care, adding she hoped Goulet's addition strengthened Community’s connection with IU.

But that may be easier said than done. Cancer is one of those service lines that can be extremely lucrative—and is therefore highly competitive among hospitals.

At Community North Hospital, for example, the average Medicare cancer patient that checked into the hospital stayed for four to seven days, racking up charges topping $35,000.

That doesn’t mean Community collects all that money. But with its charges roughly 10 times what its expenses are for cancer patients, according to federal data, Community still has plenty of margin left.

Community, like most hospitals, has invested heavily to keep up with diagnostic equipment that has helped doctors identify breast cancer long before lumps appear.

“It falls right in to what the vision is,” Sue Sandberg, Community’s vice president of women’s and children’s services, said of Community’s hiring of Goulet. “Our vision is to be the premier breast cancer destination for women.”

And there are other reasons for Community to focus on breast cancer, too. It’s the second-most-common cancer among women. And as Lottich noted, doing right by patients—especially female patients—can bring them and their families back for many other health care needs.

“Women sort of drive health care,” Lottich said. “So, when you look forward, their recognition or their identification with Community will help lead them into, maybe, looking more closely into the bariatric program [or other Community services].”


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT