IBJNews

New GOP-led House will focus on private-sector job creation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With new control of the Indiana House, Republican lawmakers plan to pursue an agenda focused on encouraging the private sector to create jobs.

GOP House members will meet at the Indiana Statehouse on Wednesday to choose their leadership—an early step in advancing priorities that include passing a budget without tax increases and rolling out economic development incentives and education reforms.

Those efforts will be critical in an economic growth strategy focused on “getting out of the way of entrepreneurs” and “creating an environment for prosperity,” said State Rep. Brian Bosma, who is expected to be chosen house speaker by fellow Republicans.

“There are those who think the state creates jobs,” Bosma said Wednesday morning, “and then there are those of us who believe job creation comes from the private sector.”

Republicans captured at least 58 of 100 seats Tuesday to wrestle control of the Indiana House from the Democrats for the first time in six years. As of Wednesday morning, results for two House seats were pending, said Tory Flynn, spokeswoman for the Indiana House Republicans.

Republicans also gained at least three seats in the Senate to garner more than a two-thirds majority.

The power shift will make it easier for Gov. Mitch Daniels to implement an agenda that’s expected to include reforms in education and local government. And it will give the GOP control of redrawing congressional and legislative district boundaries, a tool that could help them retain control of the state for years to come.

Included in the House Republicans’ “Strengthen Indiana Plan” are measures such as enhancing state tax credits for businesses that rehabilitate facilities; giving local governments more leeway to offer tax abatements and providing high-performing teachers with merit pay.

“Keeping taxes low in this state is a critical element for job creation, (but) that alone will not do it,” Bosma said.

The state’s business advocates echoed that sentiment, particularly the need to pass the next budget without raising taxes.

“We need to get through this session and put in place a two-year budget for the state that doesn’t do harm to our ability to grow jobs and economy by raising taxes,” said Kevin Brinegar, president of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. “Other states have raised taxes or are about to raise taxes, and they’ve not enjoyed the kind of job growth and economic prosperity that Indiana has.”

But some House Democrats raised concerns about a job-creation strategy that relies only the private sector. They won’t have much leverage to block Republican initiatives, though, as the minority party.

Rep. Bill Crawford, D-Indianapolis, said the federal stimulus is helping create tens of thousands of jobs in the state, although unemployment statistics haven’t backed that claim.

“There were a number of federal incentives that are going to create more jobs,” Crawford said. “You have to look at it on a case-by-case basis.”

Crafting a budget without tax increases will be a tall order for all lawmakers—and a task that could occupy a large share of the four-month session.

A September report from the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute forecast state lawmakers would need to raise taxes, make spending cuts or both because dwindling tax revenue is expected to cause a projected $1.3 billion gap.

Though he wouldn’t discuss specific cuts, Bosma said balancing the budget without additional taxes would require “an examination of each area of the state budget.”

“A prioritization of programs and expenditures is going to have to be fundamental, with last choice for cuts being public education,” Bosma said. “It’s all going to be on the table.”

Brinegar said government efficiency initiatives, such as the local government reforms recommended in the 2007 Kernan-Shepard report, also could be part of the equation.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Loan
    We wouldn't have to worry about the federal loan if the lazy abusers of the welfare system would be forced to go out and get the jobs that are available. People think that certain jobs are beneath them and would rather sit on their butts instead of working for a living.
    • Your Business?
      Tabitha, if gay marriage and illegal immigration are your business, you certainly aren't contributing to the state's economic growth. Maybe you should step out of the way and wait for your bailout check that should come before the end of the year.
    • Pay up Now
      How do the Republicans now plan on paying back the $ 2 billion dollars Indiana owes for a loan from the federal government to pay for unemployment benefits ? Will they run and hope the problem magically goes away like they did this past Spring?
    • Don't believe it for a second
      Let's just see how long it takes now for the Republican House to introduce a measure to amend the IN constitution to prevent gay marriage, to introduce anti-immigrant legislation like AZ, and other non-sensical issues. Don't believe for a second they wont focus on social issues. Right-wingers are going to have a field day. Party of small government, stay out of my life and my business.
    • Whats Jim smoking
      Jim,
      Thank God the Indiana voter's decided against the big tax and spend likes of P Bauer. What is wrong conservatism. Private sector outsourcing always costs less and provides more accountable service and results.
    • What it means
      We can be sure that more jobs for the private sector means more selling of State assets to those who filled the GOP purses and allowing the private sector to raise the cost of required state buisness. Like the toll road and the parking meters in Indianapolis, I am sure the time is rapidly approaching where Mitch will be selling the state parks to coal develpoers and resort hotel magnets in exchange for some instant cash in this pocket.
      We get what we deserve.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

      2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

      3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

      4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

      5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

      ADVERTISEMENT