IBJNews

New GOP-led House will focus on private-sector job creation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With new control of the Indiana House, Republican lawmakers plan to pursue an agenda focused on encouraging the private sector to create jobs.

GOP House members will meet at the Indiana Statehouse on Wednesday to choose their leadership—an early step in advancing priorities that include passing a budget without tax increases and rolling out economic development incentives and education reforms.

Those efforts will be critical in an economic growth strategy focused on “getting out of the way of entrepreneurs” and “creating an environment for prosperity,” said State Rep. Brian Bosma, who is expected to be chosen house speaker by fellow Republicans.

“There are those who think the state creates jobs,” Bosma said Wednesday morning, “and then there are those of us who believe job creation comes from the private sector.”

Republicans captured at least 58 of 100 seats Tuesday to wrestle control of the Indiana House from the Democrats for the first time in six years. As of Wednesday morning, results for two House seats were pending, said Tory Flynn, spokeswoman for the Indiana House Republicans.

Republicans also gained at least three seats in the Senate to garner more than a two-thirds majority.

The power shift will make it easier for Gov. Mitch Daniels to implement an agenda that’s expected to include reforms in education and local government. And it will give the GOP control of redrawing congressional and legislative district boundaries, a tool that could help them retain control of the state for years to come.

Included in the House Republicans’ “Strengthen Indiana Plan” are measures such as enhancing state tax credits for businesses that rehabilitate facilities; giving local governments more leeway to offer tax abatements and providing high-performing teachers with merit pay.

“Keeping taxes low in this state is a critical element for job creation, (but) that alone will not do it,” Bosma said.

The state’s business advocates echoed that sentiment, particularly the need to pass the next budget without raising taxes.

“We need to get through this session and put in place a two-year budget for the state that doesn’t do harm to our ability to grow jobs and economy by raising taxes,” said Kevin Brinegar, president of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. “Other states have raised taxes or are about to raise taxes, and they’ve not enjoyed the kind of job growth and economic prosperity that Indiana has.”

But some House Democrats raised concerns about a job-creation strategy that relies only the private sector. They won’t have much leverage to block Republican initiatives, though, as the minority party.

Rep. Bill Crawford, D-Indianapolis, said the federal stimulus is helping create tens of thousands of jobs in the state, although unemployment statistics haven’t backed that claim.

“There were a number of federal incentives that are going to create more jobs,” Crawford said. “You have to look at it on a case-by-case basis.”

Crafting a budget without tax increases will be a tall order for all lawmakers—and a task that could occupy a large share of the four-month session.

A September report from the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute forecast state lawmakers would need to raise taxes, make spending cuts or both because dwindling tax revenue is expected to cause a projected $1.3 billion gap.

Though he wouldn’t discuss specific cuts, Bosma said balancing the budget without additional taxes would require “an examination of each area of the state budget.”

“A prioritization of programs and expenditures is going to have to be fundamental, with last choice for cuts being public education,” Bosma said. “It’s all going to be on the table.”

Brinegar said government efficiency initiatives, such as the local government reforms recommended in the 2007 Kernan-Shepard report, also could be part of the equation.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Loan
    We wouldn't have to worry about the federal loan if the lazy abusers of the welfare system would be forced to go out and get the jobs that are available. People think that certain jobs are beneath them and would rather sit on their butts instead of working for a living.
    • Your Business?
      Tabitha, if gay marriage and illegal immigration are your business, you certainly aren't contributing to the state's economic growth. Maybe you should step out of the way and wait for your bailout check that should come before the end of the year.
    • Pay up Now
      How do the Republicans now plan on paying back the $ 2 billion dollars Indiana owes for a loan from the federal government to pay for unemployment benefits ? Will they run and hope the problem magically goes away like they did this past Spring?
    • Don't believe it for a second
      Let's just see how long it takes now for the Republican House to introduce a measure to amend the IN constitution to prevent gay marriage, to introduce anti-immigrant legislation like AZ, and other non-sensical issues. Don't believe for a second they wont focus on social issues. Right-wingers are going to have a field day. Party of small government, stay out of my life and my business.
    • Whats Jim smoking
      Jim,
      Thank God the Indiana voter's decided against the big tax and spend likes of P Bauer. What is wrong conservatism. Private sector outsourcing always costs less and provides more accountable service and results.
    • What it means
      We can be sure that more jobs for the private sector means more selling of State assets to those who filled the GOP purses and allowing the private sector to raise the cost of required state buisness. Like the toll road and the parking meters in Indianapolis, I am sure the time is rapidly approaching where Mitch will be selling the state parks to coal develpoers and resort hotel magnets in exchange for some instant cash in this pocket.
      We get what we deserve.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

      2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

      3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

      4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

      5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

      ADVERTISEMENT