IBJNews

Lottery Commission inks contract, losing bidder files protest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hoosier Lottery officials signed a 15-year contract Friday afternoon with private manager GTECH Indiana, which promises to bring the state $1.76 billion over the first five years of the contract.

Meanwhile, the only other bidder in the landmark outsourcing deal, Scientific Games, has submitted a letter of protest. Games, which is the lottery's largest vendor, complained in the Oct. 5 letter that it was not given an opportunity to give a "best and final" offer even though its bid was only 1.7 percent less than GTECH's. The letter, which asked the lottery commission not to execute a contract with GTECH, said the commission also failed to consider the cost savings that would have come from assigning the lottery contract to an existing vendor.

Indiana will be only the second state, following Illinois, to shift all its lottery operations to a private manager. Lottery officials have generally discussed outsourcing as a can't-lose proposition because the private manager will owe a penalty if it fails to meet the income targets set out in its bid, and the state would share in excess profit.

On Friday, however, lottery spokesman Al Larsen noted that GTECH's penalties and bonuses will be limited to 5 percent of the threshold income, as laid out in the bid. That means the state would miss out on some of the promised income if GTECH under-performs by more than 5 percent.

GTECH's bid documents, released Friday, show the company promised to deliver $256 million in its first full fiscal year of operations, ending June 30, 2014.  Then income is supposed to ramp up to $410 million by 2017 and 2018.

GTECH has not yet laid out its business plan for the remaining 10 years of the contract. The Indiana Lottery Commission will keep control over “significant” business decisions and will approve or reject the company’s business plan each year.

The commission chose GTECH, a subsidiary of the Italian firm Lottomatica, at its Oct. 3 meeting.

GTECH Indiana will be led by Connie Laverty O’Connor, who recently oversaw a consortium of private managers in Illinois and held senior management jobs at lotteries in New York and Georgia. “Working hand-in-hand with the Hoosier Lottery, we will build a world-class team aligned around a common goal, a commitment to delivering incremental revenues to the residents of Indiana,” she said in a prepared statement.

GTECH’s bid documents, released Friday, revealed little about its business plan. Most of the more than 1,600 pages were redacted as "trade secrets," including GTECH's plans for draw games such as Lotto, scratch-off tickets, and much of its retailer expansion strategy. Officials said earlier this month that GTECH wants to broaden the lottery's customer base by expanding sales to grocery stores, big box stores and discount stores.

The lottery and GTECH are keeping confidential the “brand transformation and marketing plan.”

The lottery commission requested bids that didn’t hinge on expanding gaming, which the commission defines as the addition of new games like Keno, or an Internet-based lottery. But lottery providers were encouraged to submit an “enhanced bid” describing the outcome of those options.

Should Indiana want to expand gaming, GTECH says it could produce another $233 million over five years with “monitor games,” which would include Keno.

Adding Internet-based games could bring $23 million over five years, and video lottery terminals could produce $920 million over five years.

Hoosier Lottery brought in about $227 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, and expects to generate $221 million next year. Lottery officials predict that a state-run lottery would bring in $4.2 bilion through 2028 but that the private-sector manager could generate $6.3 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Something Smells
    Why is the Hoosier Lottery sharing any income with a vendor? Is Karl Browning so incompetent that he couldn't sign distribution agreements with big box retailers himself and get 100% of the volume growth for the State of Indiana?
  • How much will this cost?
    I missed the part about how much the company will make to bring in the anticipated amount of revenue, before it gets to split the revenues about the anticipated amount. I can't wait for all the flashing casino lights and bells they will install at the gas stations in their attempts to sell more tickets.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT