New Hostess owners want abatement for equipment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The new owners of Hostess Brands are seeking a tax abatement to support investment of $10 million in new equipment for a plant on the east side that could employ up to 145 people.

Private equity groups Apollo Global Management and Metropolis & Co. announced in April that the Indianapolis facility, at 2929 N. Shadeland Ave., is among those it plans to reopen. The company applied for the abatement on May 28.

In its application, set for an initial hearing June 19, Hostess Brands says it "anticipates the need" to invest the money in "new manufacturing, logistics and information technology equipment."

The application describes the 145 positions as "new jobs created" and specifies an average wage of $16.82 per hour. About 300 people had been working at the facility when it closed in November.

The eight-year tax abatement would save the company an estimated $536,220, or about 62 percent, on the personal property portion of its tax bill. The company would pay an estimated $333,780 in personal property taxes related to the new equipment, the city estimates. After the abatement period, the $4 million of assessed value would generate about $90,000 annually in taxes.

If the company makes the investment and the assessment estimate holds true, Hostess' personal property would be worth more than double what the current  assessment for equipment.

The company's personal property at the Shadeland Avenue plant is assessed at about $1.8 million, records show, while real property is assessed at about $3 million.

Assessor's Office records accessed online show Hostess' previous owner owes property and personal property taxes of about $160,000.

Hostess has since paid off its real property tax bill and will be required to bring its personal property tax bill up to date before the abatement hearing can proceed, said Ryan Hunt, a senior project manager for the Department of Metropolitan Development.

Apollo and Metropolis paid $410 million to buy the Hostess and Dolly Madison snack cake lines as well as five plants after the company's liquidation process began in November 2012.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.