New law lets pharmacists provide pneumonia, HPV vaccines

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pharmacists will soon be able to offer more immunizations to customers in what lawmakers say is an effort to make health care more accessible.

Currently, pharmacists can offer flu vaccines under guidelines approved by a physician.

Starting July 1, they’ll be able to add vaccinations for pneumonia, tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis, HPV infections, and meningitis.

“We really look at this as a public health service,” said Larry Sage, executive vice president of the Indiana Pharmacists Alliance.

“The goal is to make immunizations more available,” he said. “And pharmacists are probably the most available public health care provider you can find.”

More than 40 states currently allow pharmacists to provide immunizations, although requirements for education and oversight vary. In Indiana, pharmacists must undergo immunization training.

Already, the state has more than 2,700 pharmacists trained to provide the shots and several hundred new ones are added annually. Also, the state’s pharmacy schools now integrate the training into their curriculums.

The new law will let pharmacy students administer vaccines under the direction of a professional. Thirty-five other states do so as well.

“We are pleased that the law also permits qualified students to administer immunizations under appropriate supervision,” Mary Andritz, dean of the Butler University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, said in a statement when the bill passed. “As with other areas of pharmacy practice, it is important for students to have supervised experience prior to licensure for independent practice.”

Gov. Mike Pence signed the bill in April at a ceremony at the DanMar Pharmacy in Salem where Republican Rep. Steve Davisson is the pharmacist. He was the bill’s author and said it should help consumers save money.

“It’s cheaper to go to a pharmacist  than to go to the doctor where you have to pay for a doctor’s visit too,” Davisson said. “And you’re not taking up a doctor’s time when you don’t actually have a health problem.”

Davisson said the legislation should also help boost Indiana’s immunization rates, particularly for meningitis, which is has become an increasing health problem across the nation.

The new law also requires lawmakers to study adult and children’s immunization issues.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.