New parking meters bring in $1M for Bloomington

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New parking meters in downtown Bloomington have brought in more than $1 million in their first six months despite free holidays and a harsh winter that caused many of the meters to freeze up at times.

The meters were approved a year ago amid protests from business owners who feared their long hours would deter customers and hurt their revenue. Mayor Mark Kruzan originally proposed installing 1,200 parking meters in the college town at a rate of $1 an hour, with 179 free spaces, but the city council raised the number of free spaces to a minimum of 400.

Kruzan said the early and late enforcement hours still draw criticism, but city officials are pleased with the implementation of the meters so far.

"Things have quieted down significantly," Kruzan said. "Really, discussions have started to focus on what changes could be made."

The most successful month for parking meter revenue was October, which brought in nearly $200,000. The next highest-grossing month was September, at about $185,000, The Herald-Times reported.

Public Works Department Director Susie Johnson said one of the biggest issues the city has faced with the meters was the bitter cold temperatures this winter. The city is working with the parking meter company to determine why some meters malfunctioned during strong snowstorms and days of frigid temperatures.

"The weather has taken a toll on a lot of its infrastructure," Johnson said. "We have had some issues with the meters freezing."

She said city officials expect to resolve the problem before next winter.

"We anticipate having this problem worked out," Johnson said. "We're working on the solution for that right now."

Kruzan said the city will use the meter revenue to hire two seasonal workers to help keep the downtown area free of litter and graffiti. The money also will help pay for the meter installation and for sidewalk and paving work downtown.

"It is going to produce revenue that we can reinvest into downtown," Kruzan said.


  • No free lunch
    Michael, just like everything else in life, parking is not free.
  • One Million
    The taxpayer loses one million to government should be the title.
  • Apples to Lemons
    Bob is correct. It would be helpful to know what Bloomington paid for meter installation and their annual budget for maintenance and collections. Then, I suspect that an unbiased analysis would find Bloomington will come out proportionately ahead of Indy, as will other cities, like Pittsburgh and Minneapolis, that can effectively manage their bureaucracies without the need to pay an unnecessary middleman.
  • Not apples to apples
    Indianapolis received $3.1 million from its parking meter deal in 2013. It doesn't have to use that money for meter-related expenses because the vendor is responsible for those. Bloomington will have to use the money it collects to pay for the meters, personnel, maintenance, etc.
  • Give away
    Ballard has made many "give away" deals and rush decisions. Tax payers gave millions to Keystone development for the Broad Ripple parking garage and Keystone owns it and the revenue.
  • Yep
    That appears to be correct Mr. Ogden.
  • So...
    You mean Bloomington, unlike Indianapolis, didn't need an outside vendor to give 70% of the profits to for the next 50 years? Bloomington, even though a 10th the size, is making more money off the meters than Indianapolis.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

    2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

    3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

    4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

    5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?