IBJNews

New Purdue smoking policy sparks complaints

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Purdue University's effort to limit where people can smoke has sparked dozens of complaints and even a few fires in an overfilled receptacle, but university officials say they are still working out kinks in the system.

The policy, which took effect July 1, limits smoking to 22 designated areas across campus. It also bans smoking in all vehicles owned or leased by the university.

Smokers say it's too restrictive and that areas aren't well labeled.

Senior Dallas Howard told the Journal & Courier of Lafayette that some smokers resent being restricted to areas that he says are often dirty or poorly labeled. A receptacle near the student union has caught fire because it's too full, he said.

"That is the most awful smell—burning cigarette butts," he said.

Howard said some of the areas are impossible for nonsmokers to avoid walking through, and he thinks the university should install more receptacles.

David Lehmann, president of the Pipe and Cigar Club, said the smoking areas aren't working for the club's 40 members.

"We tried smoking in the smoking areas. The things about those, they are small and not well kept and there is no place to dispose of cigars and they are not big enough," said Lehmann, a junior. "The smoke is so intrusive that we really can't smoke in these areas now."

Under the old policy, smokers were required to stay at least 30 feet from university facilities or in designated areas in the Union Club Hotel in the Purdue Memorial Union. The club was able to smoke at Founders Fountain behind Beering Hall.

Lehmann and the Purdue Student Government are asking that the smoking policy be changed to allow clubs to apply for a permit to have a designated smoking time.

Carol Shelby, Purdue's director of environmental health and public safety, said she has received two to four complaints a week about the policy. Most are from people complaining about violators or asking for more receptacles in designated smoking sites, she said.

She said she doesn't expect Purdue to add smoking areas but that it needed to re-examine the site near Purdue Memorial Union and Stewart Center that has caught fire and another near McCutcheon Hall.

"This is all about changing behaviors, and it takes time," she said.

Shelby said all student groups are required to follow university policy.

The Indiana General Assembly is expected to once again tackle the issue of a statewide smoking ban when the Legislature convenes in 2011. Indiana is among 11 states without a statewide law prohibiting smoking in public establishments.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Irony squared
    "The smoke is so intrusive that we really can't smoke in these areas now."
  • What really sucks...
    ... is smokers are in the minority.

    I know, "Majority rules is when three wolves and a lamb vote for what's supper", but we're talking about a small percentage (no more than 25%) making a stink (pun intended) and those who are in a position to establish the rules/policies/laws tend to listen to them.

    Why? Because they fear losing their positions. The smokers will band together and be a vocal minority in the next election. Those who favor someone for taking a stand aren't going to go out & march, simply because they feel the politicians are doing what they're supposed to.

    In Indianapolis, you can see people sitting in the visitors section, grabbing all of the available seats, making a lot of noise and making sure the law makers hear & see them.

    If you see the right clips, they pass out shirts to give them a unified appearance.

    When they speak of "rights", it's like the old sayings: "your right to make a fist ends at my nose" and "your right to make noise ends at my ears": "Your right to smoke ends at my nose."

    I haven't looked at the other comments. I'll wager there are some real crybabies talking about how their rights are being stomped on. If you think you've got a position, go smoke somewhere you're not supposed to, get nailed, grab a Public Defender, and make your case. If you're shot down, escalate until a particular court refuses to hear it. Overturn it. If smoking is such a great thing, get the legal system to back you.

    Tip: You won't win. The courts aren't going to do anything about it. Enjoy smoking while you can.

    In the meantime, we'll be basking in nice, smoke-free restaurants.


    This usually when they say, "if you don't like it, go somewhere else."

    Strangely, New York & California have bans on smoking. If any state is united on many fronts, it's California, the largest number of electoral votes. I can assure you those laws aren't going to be reversed.

    In terms of burning cigars in the receptacles, cigars don't last long unless something is keeping them burning - like sucking on one. If you put a cigar down - perhaps a table top for your experiment, cigars will go out in a fairly short period of time. It's because the tobacco is too loosely packed.

    Cigarettes are a different story. It's why they make good fuses.


    If there's no harm in smoking, why do benefit enrollment packets have this:

    [Yes] [No] Do you smoke?

    Now the $64k question: do I have a right to not hire a smoker simply because the premiums will go up for the remainder of my staff? So far, the answer is, "yes". Indiana's an at-will state. I can hire or fire on my whims - no cause required. I wield that with great care.

    You know what sucks?

    I have friends, who back in high school, were working in a restaurant. They didn't smoke, but when others went out, they took a hacky-sack. Management said they could go out to smoke, but not do something recreational. Smokers: don't claim you aren't special. That story points out you are.

    I helped a guy open a restaurant. It was a nice break from CompSci, starting at 17. (No one could figure out why I'd do scut work. The only time I wasn't doing computer stuff was Spring Break of my senior year in college. I needed a break. When slammed and a dishwasher was headed outside for a smoke, I made it quite obvious that if he walked out in the indoor conditions that he didn't need to come back in.

  • Ban Smoking
    I just think it is funny that you could take the quotes of the smoker, and they could come out of any non-smoker, ban supporter out there. Smoking smells... They smell... I'm glad they get a taste of what we have deal with because of THEIR dependency.

    I understand individual liberties, but until they develop a cigarette that doesn't shoot smoke into my personal space, then a ban is needed.
  • Wow
    Two to four complaints a week....wow, I bet they had to hire extra employees just to deal with all that negative feedback.
  • get over it
    HAHAHAHAH!!!! "The smoke is so intrusive that we really can't smoke in these areas now."

    I say, "The smoke is so intrusive that we really can't breath in most areas now, so smokers need designated smoking areas."

    Really though, at IUPUI the smoking receptacles catch fire and smolder all the time. They are metal boxes mounted on concrete or metal poles. Not a big deal if they catch fire.
  • Let adults be adults
    Ah, the unintended consequences of social despotism arise once again in the sainted name of public health.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT