New tax break reduces Indiana share of casino revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state's portion of gambling revenue slumped last month as Indiana's 13 casinos took advantage of a new law that allows them to reduce their tax burden.

Total tax receipts from casinos fell nearly 18 percent last month compared with May of last year, according a report released Monday by the Indiana Gaming Commission.

Jenny Reske, deputy director of the commission, told The Indianapolis Star that much of that drop resulted from casinos deducting coupons that they use to attract gamblers by letting them play for free, as allowed under a law passed by this year's General Assembly.

The new law allows casinos to deduct up to $5 million a year on the coupons. However, the state's fiscal year doesn't start until July 1, so lawmakers allowed casinos to deduct half that amount last month. Six casinos deducted the entire $2.5 million, and all but three deducted more than $1.5 million, the report said.

The tax break is intended to help Indiana casinos compete on the same basis as those in neighboring states such as Ohio and Michigan, where the coupons aren't taxed.

"Our ability to have a more level playing field with other states is something that will help us in the long run," said Daniel Nita, regional president and general manager for Horseshoe Casino in Hammond. "It allows businesses to remain competitive without having to take other measures."

Four new casinos have recently opened in Ohio, including one in Cincinnati, less than an hour's drive from three riverboat casinos in southeast Indiana.

But Reske pointed out the new Ohio casinos are owned by Caesar's Entertainment Corp. and Penn National Gaming, which also own casinos in Indiana.

The industry asked the General Assembly to allow land-based gambling for riverboat casinos and live dealers at the state's two racinos, but the tax break was about the only one casinos got. Gov. Mike Pence and several Republican legislative leaders have opposed expanding gambling, and the portion of state revenue from casino taxes has dropped significantly in recent years.

Despite the relief, casino revenues dropped 5.8 percent from May 2012.

Reske said the gaming commission will study over the next two years whether the free-play deductions benefit state in ways by increasing casino revenue or employment.

"That will be important in considering now how to move forward," she said.


  • coupon taxes?
    With those coupons the casinos are giving away free money. While I'm no accountant I wouldn't expect Coca Cola to be charged taxes on the dollar amount of coupons which they have redeemed. Businesses pay taxes on their revenue, and that amount is directly increased as a result of what they give away for promotions.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing