LOU'S VIEWS: Demonstrating nobility (and lack thereof)

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Nobility—and lack thereof—demonstrated at Eiteljorg and by NoExit Performance

ae-tennant-waitin-main-15col.jpg Craig Tennant’s “Don’t Keep Her Waitin’” is an unexpected view of Western life included in the Eiteljorg’s “Quest for the West” show. (Images courtesy of Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art)

Interpretation?That’s really not an issue at “Quest for the West,” the annual show and sale at the Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art (running through Oct 7). Every year, 50 artists, almost all returnees from the previous year, are invited to bring their work. Meanwhile, collectors from around the world come to town to meet and buy. Those works that get purchased have a sticker affixed to their nameplate, indicating they are unavailable to those straggling shoppers who come later in the run.

So what you get at “Quest” (which isn’t a bad thing), is artwork that you grasp as soon as you see it. Realistic—and sometimes hyper-realistic—images abound: horses at the water; cowboys at rest; creature-less vistas; and Native Americans tracking, playing pipes, and, in the case of a piece by Andy Thomas, posing for a painting.

There’s sculpture, too, and a bit of pottery, but the dramatic paintings tend to dominate.

ae-murphy-princess-15col.jpg Brenda Murphy’s “A Princess in Training.” 

You can, as I did, marvel again at Brenda Murphy’s pencil drawings, nearly impossible to distinguish from black and white photographs. Or Craig Tennant’s juxtaposition of tough cowgirl and rusted car in “Don’t Keep Her Waitin’.” Scott Tallman Powers proves a master of the weathered face in “Naranjas en Venta.” And Terry Isaac not only captures the texture of the Buffalo fur in “Survivors,” but also gets the frosty air around their nostrils on a freezing day.

ae-presse-quiet-1col.jpg At the Eiteljorg show, Heide Presse’s “Quiet Hours” reveals a different side of Western life. 

It’s a comforting show that could cause even the most cocooned couch potatoes to want to venture out west—or, at least, look out at the sky over Eagle Creek.

There’s much less nobility in “Closer,” Patrick Marber’s play focused tightly on four characters and their enmeshed relationships. I’d need a flow chart to tell you how and when writer Dan, photographer Anna, doctor Larry, and stripper Alice (which may or not be her real name) combine, break up, and recombine. As seen in NoExit’s production (which closes Sept. 29), Marber seems less interested in making us care about the specifics of these lives and more in forcing us to see how relationships are often based on tenuous stuff.

Romance? Not in Marber’s world. Here, whom we meet and whom we stay with are as much a function of opportunism and chance as they are with either unselfishness or truth. His characters profess love—and believe themselves to be truthful—but we know quickly enough how loosely these ties bind.

There’s plenty to think about here—and a surprising amount of humor (a showpiece scene involves deceptive sexual cyber-chat). For good and ill, while these characters present as sophisticated, they often are written more as anthropologic studies. That feeling is accentuated by the staging, which puts the audience on two sides of a cage-like square.

What the NoExit crew gets that many other theaters don’t is the importance of sexual energy between characters. We need to feel the pull among these four—the moments they are turned on and when they are turned off. This attractive quartet does that well.

What’s missing, though, is the sadness. These are people with deeper wounds than the gash in the stripper’s legs, and that doesn’t come through effectively. The show’s languid pace (and bad wigs) don’t help. For maximum effectiveness, the audience has to feel for what’s missing in these lives. After nearly three hours (including intermission), they overstay their welcome—even though I’m glad to have spent time with them.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!