IBJNews

Not following directions could bite local hospital

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Failing to follow directions could cost an Indianapolis-based health care provider tens of thousands of dollars.

Westview Hospital might be on the hook for $160,000 because it failed to communicate properly to Lehman Brothers when it decided to stop paying on an interest-rate swap arrangement after Lehman collapsed in September 2008.

Now Westview—the newest addition to the Indianapolis-based Community Health Network hospital system—is suing its financial adviser and law firm for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, essentially because they failed to read the directions on Westview’s agreement with Lehman.

The terms of the swap agreement, which hedged against interest-rate swings on $14.4 million in adjustable rate bonds, said the agreement could be terminated only by mail or in person, not by fax.

But in November 2008—two months after Lehman Brothers went out of business—Westview faxed a notice of termination, saying it was no longer paying for the interest-rate swap agreement and was ending it.

Westview says it did so on the instructions of its financial adviser—Columbus, Ohio-based Lancaster Pollard & Co.—and the law firm used by the adviser, Cincinnati-based Peck Schaffer & Williams LLP.

In September 2009, representatives of the defunct Lehman Brothers approached Westview, saying they had no record of Westview terminating its interest-rate swap agreement. When Westview produced copies of its faxes, the Lehman representatives said the fax messages were insufficient under terms of the agreement and would not hold up under New York law.

Lehman is trying to collect on the remaining amounts owed on the arrangement—$159,983—plus interest. Lehman has initiated an alternative dispute resolution proceeding against Westview to collect the money, according to Westview’s lawsuits.

Westview wants Lancaster Pollard and Peck Shaffer to pay its bill to Lehman, plus attorney fees.

Lancaster Pollard specializes in financing for hospitals and long-term care facilities. Peck Shaffer specializes in municipal bond financing.

Calls to attorneys representing both firms were not returned. The firms have not yet responded to the lawsuit, which was intitially filed in Marion County but was transferred to the U.S. District Court in Indianapolis.

Calls to Westview’s attorney and to its spokeswoman were not returned.

Westview, a 67-bed hospital at West 38th Street and North Guion Road, merged in June with Community Health Network. The deal also included Westview’s HealthPlex sports club and 180-member physician network.

Westview had annual revenue of $106 million in 2009, the most recent figure available. The hospital said it needed to be part of a larger organization to handle financial pressures and deal with the complexities of the 2010 health care reform law.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Right On Brandon
    Took the words right out of my mouth. Stay local. Plenty of good health care advisors and attorneys right here in Indy. Happy to provide a list of each if anyone needs one or the other or both.
  • Oh, yeah
    Oh, whoops. We "lost" your paperwork.
  • "Local" Hospital
    Serves them right for using Ohio based advisers and lawyers when some of the best are in their own backyard. Keep it in Indiana when at all possible.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT