IBJNews

Local office market continues vacancy struggles

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis office market suffered through a tough 2010, marked by stagnant and high downtown vacancy rates, falling suburban occupancy rates and another year without construction activity.

Those findings were part of a year-end market report released Tuesday morning by Indianapolis-based brokerage Meridian Real Estate LLC.

“Corporate downsizing continues to impact office vacancies … ” the report said. “With unemployment slightly increasing … and productivity still trending positive, demand for office space remains weak. Corporations are still generating solid revenue without adding employees.”

The overall downtown office vacancy rate at the end of 2010 remained almost the same as a year ago, ticking down from 20.4 percent to 20.2 percent, according to the report.  

Downtown’s Class A vacancy rate remains alarmingly high, at 24.5 percent.

“Downtown seems to have halted its downward trend,” the report said. “Still the vacancy remains high and could go higher depending on the pace of corporate downsizing and the amount of state office leases that may not renew.”

In the suburbs, overall offices vacancies soared from 22.7 percent to 25.3 percent during the year. Vacancy rates rose in almost every submarket.

Vacancies skyrocketed in the west/southwest submarket, with the rate shooting from 26.5 percent to 38 percent.

The Keystone submarket vacancy rate increased more than two percentage points, to 27.2 percent, and the North Meridian/Carmel rate rose one percentage point, to 21.8 percent.   

Despite high vacancies, Class A asking rents ticked up slightly, from $20 per square foot to $20.50 downtown and from $19.50 to $19.75 in the suburbs.

For the second year in a row, the entire office market experienced no construction of multi-tenant buildings.

In 2011, Meridian said it expects to see “the markets continuing to stabilize, albeit in a depressed state. Large overall vacancies across the broad market, along with thin deal flow, make for a long road before we will see positive absorption and any growth in rental rates.”

Investment sales should “slowly increase as the spread over treasuries continues to shrink, making borrowing costs attractive,” the report said. “In addition, certain large tenants currently leasing are evaluating whether owning their buildings is a more advantageous structure.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT