IBJNews

Local office market continues vacancy struggles

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indianapolis office market suffered through a tough 2010, marked by stagnant and high downtown vacancy rates, falling suburban occupancy rates and another year without construction activity.

Those findings were part of a year-end market report released Tuesday morning by Indianapolis-based brokerage Meridian Real Estate LLC.

“Corporate downsizing continues to impact office vacancies … ” the report said. “With unemployment slightly increasing … and productivity still trending positive, demand for office space remains weak. Corporations are still generating solid revenue without adding employees.”

The overall downtown office vacancy rate at the end of 2010 remained almost the same as a year ago, ticking down from 20.4 percent to 20.2 percent, according to the report.  

Downtown’s Class A vacancy rate remains alarmingly high, at 24.5 percent.

“Downtown seems to have halted its downward trend,” the report said. “Still the vacancy remains high and could go higher depending on the pace of corporate downsizing and the amount of state office leases that may not renew.”

In the suburbs, overall offices vacancies soared from 22.7 percent to 25.3 percent during the year. Vacancy rates rose in almost every submarket.

Vacancies skyrocketed in the west/southwest submarket, with the rate shooting from 26.5 percent to 38 percent.

The Keystone submarket vacancy rate increased more than two percentage points, to 27.2 percent, and the North Meridian/Carmel rate rose one percentage point, to 21.8 percent.   

Despite high vacancies, Class A asking rents ticked up slightly, from $20 per square foot to $20.50 downtown and from $19.50 to $19.75 in the suburbs.

For the second year in a row, the entire office market experienced no construction of multi-tenant buildings.

In 2011, Meridian said it expects to see “the markets continuing to stabilize, albeit in a depressed state. Large overall vacancies across the broad market, along with thin deal flow, make for a long road before we will see positive absorption and any growth in rental rates.”

Investment sales should “slowly increase as the spread over treasuries continues to shrink, making borrowing costs attractive,” the report said. “In addition, certain large tenants currently leasing are evaluating whether owning their buildings is a more advantageous structure.”
 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT