IBJNews

Pacers make it official: Bird out, Walsh back in

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Pacers made it official Wednesday morning: They are parting ways with basketball operations president Larry Bird and bringing back Donnie Walsh.

Owner Herb Simon announced the move, one day before the National Basketball Association draft. He said Bird will stay on for the draft, when the Pacers are scheduled to pick No. 26 overall in the first round.

“This is not the best-kept secret in the world,” Simon said in announcing the move. “We’ve been working on this for a while.”

The move had been the subject of speculation for months, as Bird had stayed with the team on a season-by-season basis.

Bird attributed his decision to leave the team to an ailing back and a shoulder that needs surgery, noting also that nine years is a long time to be at one job.

The 55-year-old Bird served as Pacers coach from 1997 to 2000, taking the team to its only NBA Finals appearance before returning to the front office in 2003. He took full control of basketball decisions after the 2007-08 season, when Walsh left to become president of the New York Knicks.

“Sometimes you can be at one place too long,” Bird said. “Sometimes it’s just time to go.”

Walsh is returning as the Pacers' president. Kevin Pritchard, the director of player personnel, is being promoted to general manager, replacing David Morway, who resigned Tuesday after 13 years with the team, including the past four as general manager.

Walsh spent 24 years with the Pacers before taking the Knicks job. He first arrived at the Pacers in 1984 as an assistant coach, and was elevated to general manager two years later and named president in 1988.

“When it looked like Larry was not gonna be here, Herbie called me up,” Walsh said. “And I thought, ‘yeah, I’d like to come back.’”

Bird said his job in the team’s front office was his toughest challenge in professional basketball.

“This job is a little tougher,” he said. “We started off slow, but you have to be patient.”

Bird said just a month ago that he wanted to stay with the Pacers and expressed interest in a three-year deal rather than the annual "handshake" agreements he had with Simon. Bird recently was named the NBA Executive of the Year after building a tough, young team that lost to eventual champion Miami in six games in the playoffs.

The former Indiana State player won three MVP awards and three NBA titles during his Hall of Fame career with Boston.

Bird said he would participate in the draft Thursday night and also in summer league activities before officially calling it quits.

One of the lighter moments of the announcement occurred when Bird was asked whether he would be interested in ultimately buying the team from Simon. Herb Simon and his late brother, Mel, bought the team for $11 million in 1983.

Bird said that owning the team once was a goal of his, but not anymore, but “that depends on how much Herbie leaves me in the will,” he quipped.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Walsh????
    Lord knows there are enough "goons" still in the NBA for Walsh to RUIN the repaired Pacers. Herbie we weren't that desperate for a president.
  • Morway?
    I am more concerned with Morway leaving. He was the only one that kept OJ Mayo from coming to the Pacers, which would have been a mistake. Larry was a standout player and a good coach, but as a GM I think he was ill equipped as he doesnt understand negotiating nor complex relationships---ala his last move was to fire Morway. Not right but that stuff happens in this world.
  • Corrected
    Sorry, Morway has been GM for four years. This change is now reflected in the story.
  • Morway
    For the record, Morway was with the Pacers for 13 years not 4 and must have been a pretty good advisor over the years. Good luck to Larry Legend, 55 is a great retirement age. I hope Walsh can bring back the magic
    • The Pacers
      Thought you would be interested in this.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

    2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

    3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

    4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

    5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

    ADVERTISEMENT