IBJNews

Packaging manufacturer plans to expand, add 80 jobs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based DGP Intelsius LLC, a manufacturer and distributor of temperature-controlled packaging, announced on Tuesday morning that it plans to add 80 jobs by 2014 as part of an $870,000 expansion.

The company, located at 7696 Zionsville Road, said the investment will go toward equipment, tooling and the leasing of a 13,508-square-foot building. The new facility will include Intelsius' global technical services division, which uses on-site atmospheric chambers to conduct testing of temperature-controlled products.

Intelsius—a unit of England-based DGP Life Science Ltd.—will begin hiring for finance, customer service, business development, information technology, operations and logistics positions later this month.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. said it will provide Intelsius up to $400,000 in performance-based tax credits and up to $250,000 in training grants based on the company's job-creation plans. The city of Indianapolis will consider additional property tax abatements.

“With the combination of world-class logistics and a highly educated technical work force, Indianapolis is the location of choice for us,” Andrew J. Mills, CEO of Intelsius' Americas division, said in a prepared statement. “We are proud to have our American headquarters based here in the Hoosier state.”

Founded in 1998 as DGP Group, the company developed packaging designed to transport samples suspected of containing Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis, commonly known as mad-cow disease.

Within a year, DGP became the first United Nations-certified BSE sample shipper in the world.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Seriously, What?
    I am completely sick of our government throwing so much money at companies for expansions they would have completed anyway. No wonder why governments are broke (I know, Indiana currently has a surplus). I would like someone to calculate how much our city and state provided in "incentives" or tax breaks in a given year. Also, a quick and dirty estimate of mine suggests that it will take 80 employees, 8 years to repay the tax incentives. This is rediculous!
  • What?!?!?!
    We are essentially paying an existing company to expand operations here? It seems strange. If they can't afford to expand then maybe they shouldn't.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT