IBJNews

Paoli Peaks wins big in battle with landlord over logging

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The owners of the Paoli Peaks ski resort have prevailed in a battle with their landlord, who had sought to squeeze additional revenue out of the 68-acre property by launching a logging operation.

The ski resort, which controls the southern Indiana property under a 100-year lease from the late 1970s, argued in court filings that cutting trees would violate its lease and jeopardize its business.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard L. Young in a ruling Thursday ordered a trust that owns the land to pay Missouri-based Paoli Peaks Inc. $85,222.50 for attorney's fees. The judgment follows a ruling in April that blocked the landlords from logging on the property.

Co-trustees Philip D. Weeks, Sally P. Stouse and Vann A. Weeks—heirs to Charles Weeks, who signed the original lease—showed up at the property in June 2011 and informed the general manager that they intended to begin a logging operation, court filings show.

Paoli Peaks filed suit in July 2011. The company called three witnesses including a snowmaking expert who testified that the facility's trees are vital for protecting the snow from sun and wind and to "satisfy the customers' expectation of skiing in a natural environment."

Only one witness, Philip Weeks, testified for the defendant. Under cross examination, Weeks admitted that the family intended to log the property despite the fact the lease did not grant them the right to do so, Judge Young noted in his decision.

"The court finds that Defendants asserted both before and after the litigation commenced, frivolous, unreasonable, and groundless claims and defenses, despite ample opportunities to withdraw them," Young wrote. "Defendants’ actions resulted in the unnecessary expenditure of the time and resources of the court and of Plaintiff.

The judgment amount represents more than one year's rent, which is based on operating revenue and averages about $50,000 per year.

Paoli Peaks is about 90 miles south of Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT