IBJNews

Paoli Peaks wins big in battle with landlord over logging

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The owners of the Paoli Peaks ski resort have prevailed in a battle with their landlord, who had sought to squeeze additional revenue out of the 68-acre property by launching a logging operation.

The ski resort, which controls the southern Indiana property under a 100-year lease from the late 1970s, argued in court filings that cutting trees would violate its lease and jeopardize its business.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard L. Young in a ruling Thursday ordered a trust that owns the land to pay Missouri-based Paoli Peaks Inc. $85,222.50 for attorney's fees. The judgment follows a ruling in April that blocked the landlords from logging on the property.

Co-trustees Philip D. Weeks, Sally P. Stouse and Vann A. Weeks—heirs to Charles Weeks, who signed the original lease—showed up at the property in June 2011 and informed the general manager that they intended to begin a logging operation, court filings show.

Paoli Peaks filed suit in July 2011. The company called three witnesses including a snowmaking expert who testified that the facility's trees are vital for protecting the snow from sun and wind and to "satisfy the customers' expectation of skiing in a natural environment."

Only one witness, Philip Weeks, testified for the defendant. Under cross examination, Weeks admitted that the family intended to log the property despite the fact the lease did not grant them the right to do so, Judge Young noted in his decision.

"The court finds that Defendants asserted both before and after the litigation commenced, frivolous, unreasonable, and groundless claims and defenses, despite ample opportunities to withdraw them," Young wrote. "Defendants’ actions resulted in the unnecessary expenditure of the time and resources of the court and of Plaintiff.

The judgment amount represents more than one year's rent, which is based on operating revenue and averages about $50,000 per year.

Paoli Peaks is about 90 miles south of Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT