IBJNews

Pence objects to proposed gambling expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence is asking lawmakers not to approve an expansion of gambling despite growing pressure on Indiana from new casinos in bordering states.

Pence told reporters Tuesday that he has concerns about the industry's effort to bring the state's riverboat casinos on land, add live table games at the two horse racing tracks and approve portable gambling devices.

"On that issue, we are making it known to legislators, that while I have no objection to finding ways that we can permit these Indiana businesses to be more competitive financially, I do not support an expansion of gaming in Indiana," Pence said.

The new Republican governor did, however, leave the door open on other priorities sought by the gambling industry, including changes to the state's casino admission tax.

Supporters of the new measures sought by Indiana's casino industry say they're necessary to keep pace with new competition from states including Ohio and Illinois. They also say the proposals don't constitute an expansion of gambling.

The most recent threat to Indiana's casinos comes from the opening of the $400 million Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati, across the river from southeast Indiana and some of the riverboat casinos stationed there.

Pence previously has said he supports keeping Indiana's gambling options at the status quo. This is the first time he has said he's actively asking lawmakers to vote against any expansion.

Sen. Phil Boots, R-Crawfordsville, said he didn't believe the provisions would expand gambling since those table games are already at the horse track casinos in Anderson and Shelbyville.

"We're not expanding the number of games there, we're not expanding the number of machines. It will be the same," Boots said.

Boots also maintains that allowing the casinos on the Ohio River and Lake Michigan to build on adjacent property doesn't expand gambling, either.

"It's not moving to another location where you would attract a different clientele," Boots said.

Boots said he believed the tax changes being proposed were the most important issues in the bill as the Indiana casino owners consider how to respond to growing competition from neighboring states.

"They choose where they're going to invest their money and we're trying to create a business-friendly environment in the state of Indiana just like we do with any other economic development incentive package," Boots said.

House public policy committee chairman Bill Davis, R-Portland, said he was working with other legislators on changes to the bill and expected his committee to take it up next week.

Davis said he wasn't surprised that Pence would have problems with the current casino proposals.

"I really don't see how you couldn't view them as expansions," Davis said.

Gambling opponents praised the governor's support Tuesday.

"I am pleased to have a governor oppose the expansion of gambling in Indiana," said Dan Gangler, spokesman for the Indiana Conference of the United Methodist Church, which opposes the gambling bill. "I am encouraged by fewer gamblers visiting casinos. Maybe people are wising up to casinos deceptions."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • regulation
    I thought Pence was for less regulation of business? This is why I vote libertarian. At least their positions are consistent.
  • Follow the $$$
    Pence clearly received more money from the outlying casinos, Gary, Lawrenceburg, French Lick, etc. than he did from Shelbyville or Anderson. There is no expansion of gambling. No new table games no new machines. It is all about the money and how much was given to who's campaign. I like Dan Gangler's comment that "fewer gamblers are visiting casinos" and "people are finally wising up to casinos deceptions". It does not appear that Dan is aware of the 4 new casinos in Ohio, which is the whole point of the article. Seems a bit out of touch but the lord does work in mysterious ways.
  • amazed
    I continually am amazed at politicians who claim to be conservative, want smaller government, and protect individual rights change course when it is something they do not want. The right to own multiple guns ...YES. Right to abortion..No Increase jobs by lowering government interference...YES Let the casinos actually be on the same footing as other states...NO
  • Period Piece
    I agree with Ben, I am also surprised that Pence has waited this long to let his religious prejudices rear their ugly head. I am waiting for his outlawing of electricity, indoor plumbing and central heating/air conditioning as tools of Satan...
  • Who needs jobs if we have God?
    We all knew that Mikes Ultra Right wing antics would show its ugly head at some point,I didnt think it would be this soon.Get used to it Indiana. We are about to become Penced. Who needs jobs anyway when we have God.
  • Geography
    This is the 2nd article on this subject that I've read that refers to the new Cincinnati casino as being across the river from SE Indiana. I'm pretty sure the Ohio River separates both Indiana and Ohio from Kentucky, but doesn't provide a border between Indiana & Ohio. What am I missing here?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT