Pence objects to proposed gambling expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence is asking lawmakers not to approve an expansion of gambling despite growing pressure on Indiana from new casinos in bordering states.

Pence told reporters Tuesday that he has concerns about the industry's effort to bring the state's riverboat casinos on land, add live table games at the two horse racing tracks and approve portable gambling devices.

"On that issue, we are making it known to legislators, that while I have no objection to finding ways that we can permit these Indiana businesses to be more competitive financially, I do not support an expansion of gaming in Indiana," Pence said.

The new Republican governor did, however, leave the door open on other priorities sought by the gambling industry, including changes to the state's casino admission tax.

Supporters of the new measures sought by Indiana's casino industry say they're necessary to keep pace with new competition from states including Ohio and Illinois. They also say the proposals don't constitute an expansion of gambling.

The most recent threat to Indiana's casinos comes from the opening of the $400 million Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati, across the river from southeast Indiana and some of the riverboat casinos stationed there.

Pence previously has said he supports keeping Indiana's gambling options at the status quo. This is the first time he has said he's actively asking lawmakers to vote against any expansion.

Sen. Phil Boots, R-Crawfordsville, said he didn't believe the provisions would expand gambling since those table games are already at the horse track casinos in Anderson and Shelbyville.

"We're not expanding the number of games there, we're not expanding the number of machines. It will be the same," Boots said.

Boots also maintains that allowing the casinos on the Ohio River and Lake Michigan to build on adjacent property doesn't expand gambling, either.

"It's not moving to another location where you would attract a different clientele," Boots said.

Boots said he believed the tax changes being proposed were the most important issues in the bill as the Indiana casino owners consider how to respond to growing competition from neighboring states.

"They choose where they're going to invest their money and we're trying to create a business-friendly environment in the state of Indiana just like we do with any other economic development incentive package," Boots said.

House public policy committee chairman Bill Davis, R-Portland, said he was working with other legislators on changes to the bill and expected his committee to take it up next week.

Davis said he wasn't surprised that Pence would have problems with the current casino proposals.

"I really don't see how you couldn't view them as expansions," Davis said.

Gambling opponents praised the governor's support Tuesday.

"I am pleased to have a governor oppose the expansion of gambling in Indiana," said Dan Gangler, spokesman for the Indiana Conference of the United Methodist Church, which opposes the gambling bill. "I am encouraged by fewer gamblers visiting casinos. Maybe people are wising up to casinos deceptions."


  • regulation
    I thought Pence was for less regulation of business? This is why I vote libertarian. At least their positions are consistent.
  • Follow the $$$
    Pence clearly received more money from the outlying casinos, Gary, Lawrenceburg, French Lick, etc. than he did from Shelbyville or Anderson. There is no expansion of gambling. No new table games no new machines. It is all about the money and how much was given to who's campaign. I like Dan Gangler's comment that "fewer gamblers are visiting casinos" and "people are finally wising up to casinos deceptions". It does not appear that Dan is aware of the 4 new casinos in Ohio, which is the whole point of the article. Seems a bit out of touch but the lord does work in mysterious ways.
  • amazed
    I continually am amazed at politicians who claim to be conservative, want smaller government, and protect individual rights change course when it is something they do not want. The right to own multiple guns ...YES. Right to abortion..No Increase jobs by lowering government interference...YES Let the casinos actually be on the same footing as other states...NO
  • Period Piece
    I agree with Ben, I am also surprised that Pence has waited this long to let his religious prejudices rear their ugly head. I am waiting for his outlawing of electricity, indoor plumbing and central heating/air conditioning as tools of Satan...
  • Who needs jobs if we have God?
    We all knew that Mikes Ultra Right wing antics would show its ugly head at some point,I didnt think it would be this soon.Get used to it Indiana. We are about to become Penced. Who needs jobs anyway when we have God.
  • Geography
    This is the 2nd article on this subject that I've read that refers to the new Cincinnati casino as being across the river from SE Indiana. I'm pretty sure the Ohio River separates both Indiana and Ohio from Kentucky, but doesn't provide a border between Indiana & Ohio. What am I missing here?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ