IBJNews

Low-level felons could get less prison time under plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An overhaul of Indiana's criminal sentencing laws aimed at sending fewer nonviolent offenders to prison was on its way to clearing the Legislature on Thursday.

The House voted 86-10 in favor of a compromise version reached with Senate negotiators. A Senate vote wasn't immediately scheduled but was expected ahead of Friday's planned adjournment of the legislative session.

The overhaul wouldn't take effect until July 2014, and supporters said they expect the Legislature will consider changes on specific crimes next year.

Bill sponsor Rep. Greg Steuerwald, R-Danville, said that before next year's session a legislative committee will review concerns about increased costs that counties could face for work release and other local programs under the overhaul.

"We need to make sure that these programs we have at the local level are the best so we're just not throwing money down the drain," Steuerwald said.

Provisions of the bill would require that most inmates serve at least 75 percent of their sentences, which Steuerwald said was aimed at giving crime victims and others more certainty about how much time those convicted will spend in prison. Current law allows most inmates to be released after serving half or less their sentences if they stay out of trouble while behind bars.

A major shift included in the bill would have more people convicted of lower-level property or drug crimes spend time in intensive local probation, work-release or addiction-treatment programs, with the expectation that will help prevent them from becoming career criminals. The plan also would give county judges more flexibility on suspending prison sentences and instead sending low-level felons to local programs.

Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, said he expects the changes will improve the state's justice system and reduce crime overall.

"Even more importantly, we're going to salvage a lot of lives in the process and make more people into productive citizens rather than people who sap our resources," Pierce said.

The bill includes tougher penalties for marijuana possession and dealing than first proposed — a change made after Republican Gov. Mike Pence questioned last month whether the plan was strict enough on low-level drug offenders.

The Senate moved possession of between about 1 ounce and 10 pounds of marijuana from the highest-level misdemeanor to the lowest-level felony, with a prison sentence between six months and 2.5 years. The bill originally required possession of more than 50 pounds of marijuana before becoming a felony punishable by one year to six years in prison, but that level was lowered to 10 pounds.

The Senate had also backed limiting the authority local judges would have to suspend prison sentences, but that was removed in the compromise version.

Steuerwald said the options judges should have on prison sentences would be closely reviewed by a legislative study committee later this year and could be changed before the bill's provisions would take effect in 2014.

"These issues should be taken as a whole because every time you tweak something in the sentencing rules it trickles and affects everything else," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT