IBJNews

PNC Financial's quarterly profit falls on bailout repayment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. on Thursday said its first-quarter profit fell almost 28 percent as it paid back government bailout funds.

But the Pittsburgh banking company's results when excluding charges beat Wall Street estimates, and it took a 28-percent smaller provision to cover bad loans during the quarter than it did in the previous three months.

PNC Bank has about 80 bank branches and 1,100 employees in the Indianapolis area, all doing business under the National City name. It ranks as the No. 2 bank in the area in terms of employment, according to IBJ research.

Like nearly all banks, PNC has battled mounting loan losses as consumers struggle to repay debt. The bank joined other national banks in reporting improvement in their consumer loan businesses for the most recent quarter.

Its shares rose $2.20, or 3.4 percent, to $67.50 each in pre-opening trading.

PNC said it earned $333 million, or 66 cents per share, in the January-March period. That's down from $460 million, or $1.03 a share, a year earlier.

The company says it would have earned $1.31 per share excluding a 50-cent charge related to the redemption of Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, preferred shares.

PNC paid back $7.6 billion that it received under the bank bailout plan to the Treasury Department in February.

Analysts forecast earnings of 71 cents per share, and typically exclude one-time items from the estimates.

Revenue totaled $3.76 billion, just shy of analyst estimates of $3.85 billion.

PNC's provisions for credit losses narrowed to $751 million against $880 million in the year-ago period, which the company said is a sign that the pace of credit deterioration eased at the end of 2009.

Provisions are the extra money that banks set aside to offset current and future loan losses. Investors have been eager to see when those set-asides will fall. Many analysts predict loan losses should peak some time in the first half of 2010.

"While there is still uncertainty about the economic environment and potential regulatory changes, we believe PNC is well positioned for another good year," said James E. Rohr, chairman and CEO, in a prepared statement.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • apples and oranges
    the writer got the the headline wrong. repayment of debt does not decrease profits. it is a balance sheeet transaction. only the interest portion of debt flows through the income statement. this was taught in accountng 101. the first sentence has 2 statemnts that the writer blended together
    1 profits down (income statement)
    2 bank repays debt (balance sheet)

    the headline gives you the imnpression that the repayment of the debt caused the income loss. WRONG. back to accounting 101.

    jan bednarz
    317-805-7503

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT