PNC Financial's quarterly profit falls on bailout repayment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. on Thursday said its first-quarter profit fell almost 28 percent as it paid back government bailout funds.

But the Pittsburgh banking company's results when excluding charges beat Wall Street estimates, and it took a 28-percent smaller provision to cover bad loans during the quarter than it did in the previous three months.

PNC Bank has about 80 bank branches and 1,100 employees in the Indianapolis area, all doing business under the National City name. It ranks as the No. 2 bank in the area in terms of employment, according to IBJ research.

Like nearly all banks, PNC has battled mounting loan losses as consumers struggle to repay debt. The bank joined other national banks in reporting improvement in their consumer loan businesses for the most recent quarter.

Its shares rose $2.20, or 3.4 percent, to $67.50 each in pre-opening trading.

PNC said it earned $333 million, or 66 cents per share, in the January-March period. That's down from $460 million, or $1.03 a share, a year earlier.

The company says it would have earned $1.31 per share excluding a 50-cent charge related to the redemption of Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, preferred shares.

PNC paid back $7.6 billion that it received under the bank bailout plan to the Treasury Department in February.

Analysts forecast earnings of 71 cents per share, and typically exclude one-time items from the estimates.

Revenue totaled $3.76 billion, just shy of analyst estimates of $3.85 billion.

PNC's provisions for credit losses narrowed to $751 million against $880 million in the year-ago period, which the company said is a sign that the pace of credit deterioration eased at the end of 2009.

Provisions are the extra money that banks set aside to offset current and future loan losses. Investors have been eager to see when those set-asides will fall. Many analysts predict loan losses should peak some time in the first half of 2010.

"While there is still uncertainty about the economic environment and potential regulatory changes, we believe PNC is well positioned for another good year," said James E. Rohr, chairman and CEO, in a prepared statement.


  • apples and oranges
    the writer got the the headline wrong. repayment of debt does not decrease profits. it is a balance sheeet transaction. only the interest portion of debt flows through the income statement. this was taught in accountng 101. the first sentence has 2 statemnts that the writer blended together
    1 profits down (income statement)
    2 bank repays debt (balance sheet)

    the headline gives you the imnpression that the repayment of the debt caused the income loss. WRONG. back to accounting 101.

    jan bednarz

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1