IBJNews

Potential competitor to Lilly drug shows promise in study

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Sanofi-Aventis SA’s experimental diabetes drug lixisenatide, given to volunteer patients once a day, was at least as effective as Eli Lilly and Co. and Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s twice-daily medicine Byetta in keeping blood-sugar levels in check, a study found.

The advanced study of 639 patients with the most common form of diabetes, known as Type 2, showed those taking the Sanofi drug also had fewer instances of hypoglycemia, a state of dangerously low blood sugar, Paris-based Sanofi said in a statement.

The findings could lead to more competition for Indianapolis-based Lilly, which markets Byetta outside the United States and co-markets it with Amylin in the U.S. The drug had worldwide sales of $796.5 million in 2009.

Diabetes occurs when the body doesn’t produce or properly use insulin, a hormone needed to convert sugar, starches and other food into the energy needed for daily life. Lixisenatide belongs to a class of drugs that imitate a hormone called GLP-1 to stimulate the pancreas to produce more insulin after meals. Both lixisenatide and Byetta are injections.

Sanofi trails Novo Nordisk A/S and Lilly in developing a GLP-1 product. Peter Welford, an analyst at Jefferies International Ltd., wrote in a note to investors Tuesday that he expects lixisenatide to have "blockbuster" sales. The full study will be released at a medical conference, the drugmaker said. Zealand Pharma A/S of Denmark developed lixisenatide from the spit of the Gila monster.

Byetta uses a synthetic version of a substance in Gila monster saliva.

Separately, Roche Holding AG said Tuesday that it’s stopping development of another GLP-1 treatment, taspoglutide, and returning rights to developer Ipsen SA.

After “extensive analysis,” the Switzerland-based company said it has decided to stop development of the medicine. Ipsen said it will sift through the Roche research and could seek another partner. The decision may mean the end of development for a drug that some analysts once predicted would have annual sales of more than $1.38 billion and compete with Byetta and Novo Nordisk’s Victoza.
 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT