IBJNews

Potential Lilly antipsychotic falls short in study

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. said a potential treatment for acute schizophrenia failed in a late-stage study that compared patients taking the drug to those taking a placebo.

The Indianapolis drugmaker said Wednesday that patients taking the drug, labeled pomaglumetad methionil, showed no difference in progress compared to those taking a placebo. A control group of patients taking another drug, risperidone, which goes by the brand name Risperdal, did show a difference.

Lilly said the study was one of two late-stage trials being conducted to support use of the drug, also known as mGlu2/3, as a stand-alone treatment for acute schizophrenia. The company plans to continue the second study as well as a mid-stage trial that uses the drug in combination with some atypical antipsychotics to help determine its fate.

The drugmaker is studying pomaglumetad methionil to see whether it can work as an antipsychotic without side effects like weight gain that come with current treatments.

Lilly lost U.S. patent protection for its all-time, best-selling drug, the antipsychotic Zyprexa, last fall. It also faces more patent expirations in the next few years that will expose some of its best-selling drugs to cheaper, generic competition. Some analysts are concerned about the drugmaker's ability to replace the lost revenue.

Lilly has said it will depend on sales from developing countries, its animal health business and its pipeline of drugs under development, among other revenue sources. A company spokeswoman said Wednesday Lilly has 12 potential treatments in late-stage clinical testing.

Company shares fell 20 cents, to $42.66 each, in morning trading Wednesday, while broader trading indexes slipped less than 1 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT