Profit falls at Lilly but meets Wall Street expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Profit fell at Eli Lilly and Co. in the third quarter but met Wall Street analysts’ expectations.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker earned $1.24 billion in the three months ended Sept. 30, down 5 percent from the same quarter a year ago.

Profit per share was $1.11 in the quarter. Excluding severance costs for laid-off workers, Lilly would have earned $1.13 per share, the same number analysts were expecting, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

Lilly’s revenue in the quarter surged 9 percent from the third quarter of last year to $6.15 billion. Analysts were expecting revenue of $6.06 billion.

“In the third quarter Lilly continued to drive revenue growth for many key brands, including Cymbalta, Humalog, Forteo and Strattera, with strong growth also seen in animal health, Japan and China. This growth offset the continued erosion of Gemzar sales due to generic competition,” said Lilly CEO John Lechleiter in a prepared statement.

Lilly is three days away from the expiration of its U.S. patent on Zyprexa, its best-selling drug. The $5 billion-a-year antipsychotic therapy also loses patent protection in Europe this month.

In a statement this morning, Lilly said, “the company expects the introduction of generics to result in a rapid and severe decline in Zyprexa sales.”

Lilly is trying desperately to offset those lost sales with rapid growth of its other products. The four Lechleiter cited all saw their sales grow by 20 percent or more in the third quarter compared with the same period a year ago.

Cymbalta led the way, growing sales by 29 percent over last year to $1.1 billion.

Sales at Lilly’s animal health subsidiary, Greenfield-based Elanco, grew 28 percent in the quarter to $451 million.

Sales of the cancer drug Gemzar, which saw its patent expire in November 2010, plummeted 72 percent in the quarter to just $91 million.

Lilly did not raise its full-year profit forecast, but narrowed the range of its expectations. The company expects to earn $3.89 to $3.94 per share for the year, compared with an earlier prediction of $3.85 to $3.95 per share.

Excluding charges for licensing drugs from other companies and laying off workers, Lilly expects to earn $4.30 to $4.35 per share. On that basis, Lilly previously said it would earn $4.25 to $4.35 for the year.


  • Zyprexa issues linger
    PTSD treatment for Veterans found ineffective.
    Eli Lilly Zyprexa Olanzapine.
    The use of powerful antipsychotic drugs has increased in children as young as three years old. Weight gain, increases in triglyceride levels and associated risks for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The average weight gain (adults) over the 12 week study period was the highest for Zyprexa—17 pounds. You’d be hard pressed to gain that kind of weight sport-eating your way through the holidays.One in 145 adults died in clinical trials of those taking the antipsychotic drugs Zyprexa.
    This was Lilly's # 1 product over $ 4 billion per year sales,moreover Lilly also make billions on drugs that treat the diabetes often that has been caused by the zyprexa!
    --- Daniel Haszard Zyprexa victim activist and patient who got diabetes from it.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.