IBJNews

Program offers women entrepreneurs their own experts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

After 20 years in business, Jeryl Mitsch wants to grow her architecture and interior design firm, but isn’t sure how. She’s about to get some high-powered help.

Carmel-based Mitsch Design was the first local company chosen to participate in the AthenaPowerLink program for woman-owned businesses. Mitsch Design will receive free assistance for a year through an advisory panel handpicked to assist the firm. Mitsch will begin meeting with the panel this month.

“I’m beyond excited,” Mitsch said. “It’s my Christmas present this year.”

The program began in Pittsburgh in 1992 and has spread across the country and to several foreign countries. It is offered through Chicago-based Athena International. The program entered the local market last year through the sponsorship of National City Bank, law firm Krieg DeVault LLP, Sponsel CPA Group and RJE Business Interiors.

The primary goal is to support woman-owned businesses, said Julie Carpenter, a partner at Krieg DeVault. According to AthenaPowerLink, the program helps participants increase sales and profits and purchase their own property.

Jeryl Mitsch (IBJ Photo/Robin Jerstad)

But the opportunity for a positive mentoring experience is a draw for her and other members of the local governing body, she added. All people involved with the program locally are volunteers.

Although the Athena program will assist just one local company this year, Carpenter eventually hopes to be able to help more.

Mitsch Design was selected from among 14 local applicants. The local Athena governing body first scored all the applications and narrowed the list to four, then conducted site visits and interviews with the finalists. Mitsch sold the committee on herself, and she was chosen in November, Carpenter said.

“[Mitsch] had a great business plan,” Carpenter said. “She knew what she wanted to do. We thought we could help her the most.”

Sharon O’Donoghue, executive director of the local Business Ownership Initiative, said she applauds Athena’s effort to support entrepreneurs, but that the program wasn’t well-publicized, which may account for the small number of applicants.

She said the program highlights the importance of having a team of advisers. Women business owners even can create such teams themselves, she added.

Mitsch’s advisory panel will include an attorney, accountant, banker, marketing professional, information technology expert, former CEO, woman business owner and government procurement specialist. They will meet with her at least six times.

The composition of the panel was based on needs Mitsch outlined in her application. At the top of that list was IT assistance.

Although Mitsch employs just 10 people, it competes against international firms with sophisticated 3-D computer imaging capability. Mitsch’s equipment also must be able to communicate with that of its major clients.

“I have to be as sophisticated as Dow AgroSciences,” Mitsch said. “It’s difficult to keep up with that.”

Mitsch, 54, also wanted help evaluating whether to pursue government contracts. She likes the idea of a revenue stream with potential for repeat business, so she can spend more time advising clients and less on drumming up projects.

But she has been working on the paperwork to become a federal contractor for six months, and isn’t even close to finished. She’d like to get advice on whether it makes sense to keep plowing through.

She has learned about the importance of diversification the hard way. During the last economic downturn after 9/11 her company suffered because nearly all of her business was corporate.

Now her company, which posted $1.3 million in revenue last year, has clients ranging from the Indianapolis Museum of Art to Community Health Network.

Mitsch also hopes the advisory panel might suggest other ways to improve her operations. After 20 years, she admits she might be stuck in certain areas and could benefit from some fresh ideas.

“It’ll be fun to see how it all pans out,” Mitsch said. “I’m very open to the future.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT