IBJNews

Proposed Broad Ripple parking garage gets zoning OK

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

An Indianapolis zoning appeals board on Tuesday afternoon approved the necessary variances that likely will allow a controversial mixed-used parking garage and retail project to be built in Broad Ripple.

Pending a 30-day appeals period, developer Keystone Construction Corp. is ready to start construction on the $15 million, three-story garage at the three-way intersection of Broad Ripple and College avenues, and Westfield Boulevard. A vacant gas station and a pizza shop now occupy the site.

The city is helping finance the 350-space garage with $6.3 million in parking meter revenue.

“We’re taking an eyesore and turning it into what will meet a community need,” said Keystone’s attorney, Joe Calderon. “Is it perfect? No. We wish we could do more, but we can’t.”

Calderon said Keystone is hamstrung by the small, triangular 1.3-acre site.

Keystone will construct the building without a required 70-foot setback and no loading spaces for deliveries. Instead, the parking garage will front the streets and be separated only by sidewalks, with street-side loading on College Avenue.

Also, nine parking spaces in the parking garage will be reserved for compact cars and will be smaller than the 9-foot minimum-width requirement for garage spaces.

But perhaps most controversial to the project is a plan to include a bank and a drive-through, which neighbors contend will substantially increase traffic in the area.

Attorney Steve Mears, who represents several area business owners, including Broad Ripple Animal Clinic, spoke against the plan.

The developer has yet to line up a bank for the site, prompting Mears to ask that it drop the drive-through from site plans.

“When this location was announced in June,” he said, “my clients were very concerned.”

The drive-through also has drawn some criticism from the Broad Ripple Village Association, which mostly supports the project.

Tom Healy, a board member of the association, said the parking garage will take an eyesore and turn it into an asset, creating a gateway into the neighborhood.

“We want this to be more than just a car barn,” he said, “and we feel we’re headed in the right direction.”

The city is investing in the project to fix a simmering parking problem in Broad Ripple, and to clean up a blighted corner with a long-vacant Marathon station. Keystone will own the project, including the garage, and collect all the revenue.

The Mayor’s Office sought proposals in March and ultimately picked from seven options, including bids by powerhouse local developers Kite Realty Group, Browning Investments and Buckingham Cos.


 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • In Fairness
    In fairness, JJ, on this one we're not taking any risk. We KNOW we're going to be out $6.8 million while getting nothing in return.
  • remember the mantra
    I love free market economics, again the republicans want to social risk and privatize profit. I love the idea the risk is mine, and the cash goes to someone else.
  • FYI
    Tom Healy was the BRVA member that was the driving force behind the poorly thought out Broad Ripple Avenue bike lanes that virtually everyone in Broad Ripple thinks was a terrible idea.
    • Not a $15 Million Project
      I have been through that contract with a fine toothed comb - twice. There is nothing in the contract that suggests it is a $15 million project. In fact most garages of that size are in the range of $6 million or so, which is what we taxpayers are paying. There is also nothing in the contract that requires Keystone to put up a dime. Keystone could easily get the garage and the now doubled retail space for nothing or next to nothing. We taxpayers foot the bill. Keystone gets the profits.
    • why do they get all the profits
      Agreed, it is very strange to me that the city is fronting some of the money but not getting one penny of the revenue. I could understand them getting a smaller portion of revenue than Keystone Construction or that whatever revenue they get eventually expires after some time. But why on earth did they make this deal without securing some of the profits?
    • Something is wrong with this picture.
      "The city is helping finance the 350-space garage with $6.3 million in parking meter revenue."

      "Keystone Construction Corp. will own the project, including the garage, and collect all the revenue."

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

      2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

      3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

        My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

      4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

        Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

      5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

        My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

        It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

        Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

        The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

      ADVERTISEMENT