IBJNews

Proposed Illiana Expressway loses key vote

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The head of northeastern Illinois' planning agency called Wednesday for an end to Gov. Pat Quinn's push for the Illiana Expressway, saying the proposed $1.3 billion tollway south of Chicago into Indiana is "a highway in nowhere land."

Gerald Bennett made the remarks before Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning board members voted 10-4 against the project, despite what Bennett said was unfair pressure by Quinn on the board. The agency's policy committee will have the final say in a vote next week. Its approval is needed to open the door to federal funding for the 47-mile tollway between Indiana and Illinois, which the Illinois Department of Transportation says will lead to economic development.

The governors of both states have touted the project as a way to speed goods by truck, reduce congestion and create thousands of jobs.

"I have never seen so much political pressure put on members of this board in the history of this agency," Bennett said at the board meeting, explaining that some members had expressed private concerns about the potential consequences of voting no.

"They don't want to upset IDOT; they don't want to upset the governor down the road. ... If IDOT refuses to give our towns or area money, so be it," said Bennett, who is also mayor of the southern Chicago suburb of Palos Hills.

Bennett accused the state's Transportation Department of being weeks late with payments to the agency totaling $2.2 million. He says it's no coincidence the delays — the first in years — began in July, after his agency released a negative assessment of the expressway project.

In response, the Transportation Department released a letter that its chief, Ann Schneider, sent to the planning agency Tuesday. It said the delays were the result of increased scrutiny after ineligible items were found in reimbursement claims, including one from the planning agency.

The tollway would cross a rural area south of Chicago, offering cars and trucks an east-west link between Interstate 65 in Indiana and Interstate 55 in Illinois. The two states say construction could start late next year or in the spring of 2015.

Businesses, labor unions and community groups all support the project.

A Baptist minister from Chicago's south suburbs, David Bigsby, was among residents who addressed Wednesday's board meeting, saying the area has been held in an "economic death row."

"I pastor to people who don't have jobs. I pastor to people that are losing homes. I pastor to people that are in despair. This highway gives us some hope," he said.

Illinois hopes to lure private investors to put up some of the cost of building, operating and maintaining the road in a 35-year deal. Tolls would help repay the debt.

But in an analysis released in September, the planning agency concluded the route's traffic and tolls would fall short, leaving taxpayers on the hook for anywhere from $440 million to $1.1 billion.

Agency staffers also concluded that because of the corridor's location 10 miles south of built-up areas on the edge of suburban Will County, it would have minimal impact on any economic development or long-term job creation beyond the workforce needed to build it.

"We're not sure how building a roadway that ... is going to be built for vehicles and trucks to go around them, how that creates jobs for those communities," the planning agency's executive director, Randall Blankenhorn, told reporters after the vote.

Environmental groups also oppose the project, saying it would threaten endangered wildlife, critical habitat and other sensitive areas.

Schneider gave interviews to news outlets Monday to counter opponents. She said the state's adviser on the project, Ernst & Young, found toll revenues would top the costs of operating and maintaining the road, providing the state with money to invest in other transportation work.

The transportation chief also said the road was important to staying competitive.

"A lot of people, what they don't realize is that right now we are in competition for being a freight hub with places like Memphis, Tenn.; Columbus, Ohio," she told The Associated Press.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • How true
    Agreed --No doubt the Chicago board will follow Monroe Countys steps. Rejecting, then after being pressured by INDOT, lamented. We've seen this act before. I think it is written into FHWA's playbook. Perhaps Illinois DOT forgot be bring a goodie-bag in the "discussions" with the Chicago board.
  • Just a speed bump
    Don't worry, just like INDOT forced Monroe County to approve I-69, IDOT will force CMAP to approve this route.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

    2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

    3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

    4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

    5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

    ADVERTISEMENT