IBJNews

Purdue faculty leader urges cooperation with Daniels

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The leader of Purdue University's faculty senate has encouraged professors to cooperate with Gov. Mitch Daniels has he prepares to take over as the school's president in January.

Daniels scheduled two forums each for Tuesday and Wednesday on the West Lafayette campus with professors and others from eight of Purdue's academic colleges, with more forums planned for October, the Journal & Courier reported.

University Senate chairman Paul Robinson, a biomedical engineering professor, told that group Monday that Daniels was doing more to familiarize himself with campus issues before taking over as president than other recent Purdue leaders could do.

"He will have had six months to work out what is going on behind the scenes — trying to work out what is reality and what is not," Robinson said. "We as faculty will have had the most access to a future president in the history of this institution."

The Purdue trustees voted in June to hire the Republican governor to replace France Cordova, who stepped down in July after five years leading the 75,000-student university system. Daniels will start at Purdue after his second term as governor ends in January.

Some students and faculty have complained about Daniels' lack of an academic background and that he either appointed or reappointed all of the Board of Trustees members who picked him.

Robinson said he has had frequent communication with Daniels since his selection and that all faculty members should want Daniels to succeed.

"Mitch Daniels is making a strong attempt at being open-minded in his evaluation," Robinson said. "He is allowing himself to be scrutinized by the faculty, and he has so far been forthcoming in his responses."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT