IBJNews

Purdue hopes center simplifies commercialization

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Like all universities, Purdue University wants to derive more revenue from the research of its professors. But the West Lafayette school’s leaders think the process of matching its professors with people who can help create commercial products is too cumbersome.

So last week Purdue announced a new Innovation and Commercialization Center, which is supposed to be a one-stop shop for professors to get help developing their research into products and for outside investors to find out what research is taking place inside Purdue.

In addition, the center will have a small pool of money to make selective seed grants of about $50,000 per year to help professors test concepts, develop prototypes, find external development partners or get help doing market research.

Purdue President France Cordova said Purdue Research Foundation already has been doing many of these activities, but she thought the communication about and access to those services could be improved.

“All the different efforts that we have scattered,” she said, “you have to work awfully hard to find out that it’s there.”

Cordova even wants students to bring their ideas to the center and try to commercialize them.

The new center will operate as a subsidiary of the Purdue Research Foundation and be located in Purdue’s Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship. It will operate during its first year with $1 million in alumni funds, and likely will ramp up to operations and investing funds of $2.5 million per year, Cordova said. She stressed that the center will receive no state funding.

The center will be run initially by Gerry McCartney, Purdue’s chief information officer. The center’s investment work likely will focus on information technology, at least at first, Cordova said, but it’s purpose is to help researchers in all areas so that Purdue has a culture that encourages professors to work on commercialization—not just on getting their research articles published in academic journals.

“Not to be forgotten is the whole cultural signal that this launches, that we care about the D as much as the R,” said Cordova, referring to research and development, which is commonly abbreviated R&D. She added, “Yes you can get promotion and tenure and you can be recognized as having an impact by focusing on the D part.”

Cordova said the Innovation and Commercialization Center would operate similarly to Purdue’s Alfred Mann Institute for Biomedical Engineering. Since being established in 2007, the Mann Institute has searched out innovative work among Purdue faculty, selectively doling out seed grants.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT