IBJNews

Purdue prof: 'Clunkers' could stall retail sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The federal "Cash for Clunkers" program has opened a floodgate of car sales that President Obama says is a much-needed boost for the economy. But retailers may feel the negative effects of America's collective investment in new cars, predicts a Purdue Retail Institute researcher.

Formally called Car Allowance Rebate Systems, the clunkers program pays drivers $3,500 or $4,500 to trade in a gas-guzzling vehicle for a new fuel-efficient car. The first $1 billion allocated to the program lasted less than two weeks, and the federal government is considering a $2 billion extension of the subsidy.

Because more Americans are taking on new car payments, they're likely to have less money to spend on other retail items, Purdue University's Richard Feinberg said in a news release today.

"The fact is that if the 'Cash for Clunkers' program induces people to buy a car when they weren't expecting to buy a car, that money is not going to be available for retailers," he said. "Retailers don't have a fighting chance, and there is nothing to be done."

Feinberg said with about 750,000 new cars in American garages with an average monthly payment of $400, retailers counting on back-to-school and holiday-season windfalls could be disappointed.

"Retailers are still in pain from a very poor 2008 Christmas holiday retail season," he said. "After suffering from the worst holiday sales season since 1970, retailers will be facing an even more dismal 2009 in part because of the 'Cash for Clunkers' program."

Credit Suisse economist Jonathan Basile told The Wall Street Journal yesterday that it is "very possible ... there could be some kind of substitution effect," as consumers invest their money in cars rather than clothing and other retail.

But Jim Kittle, CEO of Indianapolis-based Kittle's Furniture, said despite the new car subsidies, he is expecting a better holiday season than 2008.

"Actually, I think it ['Cash for Clunkers'] is getting people back in the spending market," he said. "I think we will have a better Christmas than last year. We are coming out of the recession or whatever we are in."

"I think the fourth quarter is going to be pretty good," he said. "I would like cash for broken furniture too, but I don't think we are going to get that."

Kristin Kohn, owner of Mass Ave stores Silver in the City, At Home in the City and Nurture, said she is planning for a Christmas season equal to last year's. Even if her stores see a decline, she wouldn't attribute it to the CARS program.

"Even if I thought that I saw a decrease in sales, maybe we would take a little bit of a loss for a greater good. I personally think it's a great program," she said. "If I feel like it is going to limit people spending in our stores, then I will look for other ways to make up for it through marketing and other variables."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT