IBJNews

Purdue prof: 'Clunkers' could stall retail sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The federal "Cash for Clunkers" program has opened a floodgate of car sales that President Obama says is a much-needed boost for the economy. But retailers may feel the negative effects of America's collective investment in new cars, predicts a Purdue Retail Institute researcher.

Formally called Car Allowance Rebate Systems, the clunkers program pays drivers $3,500 or $4,500 to trade in a gas-guzzling vehicle for a new fuel-efficient car. The first $1 billion allocated to the program lasted less than two weeks, and the federal government is considering a $2 billion extension of the subsidy.

Because more Americans are taking on new car payments, they're likely to have less money to spend on other retail items, Purdue University's Richard Feinberg said in a news release today.

"The fact is that if the 'Cash for Clunkers' program induces people to buy a car when they weren't expecting to buy a car, that money is not going to be available for retailers," he said. "Retailers don't have a fighting chance, and there is nothing to be done."

Feinberg said with about 750,000 new cars in American garages with an average monthly payment of $400, retailers counting on back-to-school and holiday-season windfalls could be disappointed.

"Retailers are still in pain from a very poor 2008 Christmas holiday retail season," he said. "After suffering from the worst holiday sales season since 1970, retailers will be facing an even more dismal 2009 in part because of the 'Cash for Clunkers' program."

Credit Suisse economist Jonathan Basile told The Wall Street Journal yesterday that it is "very possible ... there could be some kind of substitution effect," as consumers invest their money in cars rather than clothing and other retail.

But Jim Kittle, CEO of Indianapolis-based Kittle's Furniture, said despite the new car subsidies, he is expecting a better holiday season than 2008.

"Actually, I think it ['Cash for Clunkers'] is getting people back in the spending market," he said. "I think we will have a better Christmas than last year. We are coming out of the recession or whatever we are in."

"I think the fourth quarter is going to be pretty good," he said. "I would like cash for broken furniture too, but I don't think we are going to get that."

Kristin Kohn, owner of Mass Ave stores Silver in the City, At Home in the City and Nurture, said she is planning for a Christmas season equal to last year's. Even if her stores see a decline, she wouldn't attribute it to the CARS program.

"Even if I thought that I saw a decrease in sales, maybe we would take a little bit of a loss for a greater good. I personally think it's a great program," she said. "If I feel like it is going to limit people spending in our stores, then I will look for other ways to make up for it through marketing and other variables."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT