IBJNews

Purdue trustees OK performance bonus for Daniels

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Purdue University trustees are giving school president Mitch Daniels a performance bonus for his first six months in office.

Trustees approved the $58,000 bonus following a five-minute discussion Friday.

Daniels has a base salary of $420,000.

The performance goals for Daniels haven't been set.

Trustees chairman Keith Krach praised the job Daniels has done since he became president of Purdue in January.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Where's the bonus for the hardworking purdue employees???
    My husband has worked for Purdue for over 17 years and barely makes over $13 an hour. He has yet to find out whether he will receive a raise this fiscal year, but I guess not since good 'ole Mitch got his bonus. I'd like to see Mitch go out on the farm and do what my husband does which includes sticking his hand in a cow to pregnancy check!
  • Mitch and fiduciary dont match
    To put word fiduciary with Mitch Daniels doesn’t seem right to Purdue grads who worked for IPL………….
  • I knew it!
    I knew the headline of this piece would bring out the Daniels haters. Two things to remember here. First, Daniels can't award himself a bonus. Second, those of you who think that the Trustees are somehow lapdogs for Daniels because he appointed them (his duty as Gov.) are displaying ignorance. Each member of that board is highly distinguished by education, experience and success in their career. All have served in many senior leadership positions before they were ever even considered. Theirs is a fiduciary duty to the University, not to any one employee and they know that. Second guessing their wisdom is your privelege, but it makes you look petty and shallow-minded. By the way, Tom Crean makes more money and he's just a football coach.
  • figures
    Here goes Purdue wastefully spending money again. It amazes me how free they are with giving away and spending tax supported dollars.
  • funny
    Funny how people are making such a big deal over a relatively small amount of money. Really - do you think somehow 58k increase in Mitch's salary is going to increase tuition?? Most college presidents a paid really well - agree or disagree, that is how it is. I would be more concerned of what Dan Evans makes running the IU Health Care system
  • Lord Shortie and his cronies
    That Board is corrupt. $58,000 for being a clock puncher. This is why student tuition is so high. The guy is a slug.
  • performance bonus?
    He has been there six months and the story says that "The performance goals for Daniels haven't been set.", but he somehow qualifies for a $58,000 bonus. What will he get when he figures out where the men'Return NEuroplas room is?
  • wtf?
    I like Mitch and think he was a great governor, but..... given the sacrifices he's asking all Purdue staff to make, he should turn down this money. It sets a REALLY bad example.
  • Rich vs. Poor
    Rewarding Executives and high-level Administrators with 100% year-over-year salary increases and bonuses, regardless of performance (or even bad performance in some cases), has become an American norm. This is why the average worker in America has become cynical. Unfortunately, the old mantra of "hard work pays off" is being eroded by a system that rewards wealth, not hard work.
  • What a surpise!
    How typical of an institution like PU to pick a president with his own appointed trustees, and then give him a bonus that is based on unspecific goals. Do you think Mitch the gov would put up with this crap?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT