J.K. Wall
December 9, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dhan Shapurji, an Indianapolis-based health care consultant for Deloitte, advises hospitals, health insurers and others on how to meet looming challenges and opportunities in the health care industry. He discussed the potential impact of health reform bills pending in Congress.

IBJ: What will be the most significant change to the health care market if the Senate health reform bill goes into effect as-is?

A: The inclusion of 30 million more folks. That is the most significant change. The ramification of bringing in those 30 million plays throughout the whole system. Insurance reform as well: It has been the area that has gained the most attention. The individual mandate, the potential for an employer mandate, but also what will happen with the benefit design. All of those are very tangible things that consumers will feel and see out of the reform that goes through.

IBJ: Which parts of the health care industry will be the biggest winners under health reform, and which will be the biggest losers?

A: The hospitals and the provider community will fare well underneath this scenario, perhaps relative to other players, primarily because you have an influx of customers into the system. Hospitals will get relief on the bad debt. But the influx of more people into the system could create supply issues. The one issue of uncertainty is the cost area. Certainly, utilization going up has the potential to raise costs throughout the system. It may put pressure on state governments because, as you know, their budgets aren’t exactly in the best shape today.
IBJ: You've said before that the big health care problem in the United States is the tens of trillions of dollars in unfunded commitments under the Medicare program, which is projected to become insolvent by 2017. Are there elements in either the House or Senate health reform bills that would improve that long-term situation?

A: What we see in the legislation today doesn’t really directly do it. It’s really focused on "How do we bring the 30 million into it?" rather than "How do we make Medicare solvent?" The changes that need to be made are pretty darn significant. One of the changes is perhaps taking [the minimum age for Medicare eligibility] up to 70. Another one suggested is means testing [where wealthier recipients would pay more for Medicare benefits]. And another one that’s being talked about is raising the payroll tax. I think, personally, it’s going to take benefits changes, and some combination of the others.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............