IBJNews

Q&A

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Thad Johnson became CEO of Methodist Sports Medicine/The Orthopedic Specialists on June 15, the first time the 19-physician practice has had a non-physician executive. Johnson most recently was an independent health care consultant in Phoenix, and has previously served as an executive leading physician practices, physician outpatient centers and hospital systems. His mission at Methodist Sports Medicine (which has a partnership with Indiana University Health) is to look for growth opportunities for the 120-employee practice, including potentially bringing in new doctors. He said he’s also trying to establish relationships with employers in the community, who may need Methodist Sports Medicine to help injured workers get back on the job.

IBJ: What’s your outlook for the orthopedic market, particularly given all the changes being driven by the 2010 health reform law?
A: There’s going to be an increased need for orthopedics. If you think about just the demographics. People are living longer. There’s so many more things we can do to help people. Joint replacements used to be 60 and above, now it’s getting down to people in their 40s and 50s.

IBJ: Orthopedics has always been highly competitive here in Indianapolis, between the hospitals and among physician groups like OrthoIndy and Methodist Sports Medicine. Do you think it’s more competitive here than in other markets?
A: It’s as competitive as anywhere. You know that a lot of orthopedic surgeons are current athletes or former athletes who just love that competition. We see people really competing against us. These guys [at Methodist Sports Medicine] have developed a reputation over the last 30 years that is just extraordinary. I just hear these stories everywhere I go. We’re the team physicians for the [Indianapolis] Colts. This contract started in 1984, and it’s a year-to-year contact. And the Colts have renewed it every year.

IBJ: You said Methodist Sports Medicine would like to add more physicians. Why did they need to bring a business executive to do that?
A: They recognize that the market is changing, that they need a sophisticated business executive to approach this as a business. In the past, we’ve had people approach us, both groups and individuals and say, "We want to join you." They need a corporate structure and an infrastructure to grow and expand  their practice. We need to be in a position to pursue the opportunities that are being offered to us. We are in the process of developing a formal business [plan] like any other business. Most medical groups don’t.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT