IBJNews

Quail Run Apartments in Zionsville changes hands

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The 166-unit Quail Run Apartments in Zionsville has been purchased by Richmond, Va.-based McCann Realty Partners LLC.

The acquisition, completed June 20, was financed by Bethesda, Md.-based Beech Street Capital LLC, which provided a $9.25 million Fannie Mae loan to McCann Realty. The actual purchase price was undisclosed.

McCann Realty also owns the 348-unit Northlake Village complex in Noblesville and the 267-unit Mission Hills Village complex in Greenwood.

Built in 1972, Quail Run will be managed by Indianapolis-based Buckingham Management LLC, a division of Buckingham Cos.

Quail Run Apartments features one- to four-bedroom units, a swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, clubhouse, covered parking and a playground. Rents range from $640 to $1,600 per month.

McCann said it plans to upgrade the property within the next three years by adding new amenities and redecorating interiors.

Founded in 2004, McCann owns 17 apartment complexes totaling 4,000 units and valued at about $300 million. It also has developed two rental properties in Texas and has another two under construction there.  

The sale of Quail Run marks the second time the apartment complex has changed ownership in the past two years.

In October 2009, Los Angeles-based hedge fund QVT Mount Auburn Capital bought Quail Run from Denver-based Apartment Investment & Management Co.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Don't rent here!
    New management is terrible! As soon as current renters leases were up a large increase was made to the new lease. One family was told it would be $110 dollars a month more and had to move out. Multiple other families are moving out for the same reason. Lies were told that the new exercise room would be free, then we would get a refundable deposit now no refund is offered. The new owners do not care about the tenants they just care about making money. The previous owners and staff were really wonderful and are greatly missed in the complex. Beware! Watch out for lies from new management.
  • High-priced dump
    We looked at the complex a couple of years ago. Summary: Overpriced and decrepit. Seemed dated, in overall poor structural condition, and the fact that it's changed hands a couple of times indicates that it's an investment hot potato.
  • Quail Run
    Not only did it get bought out. Now all of a sudden, there are all new employees running the place here. We miss the main lady!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT