IBJOpinion

Rapid rise of ExactTarget uplifting for young techies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Hewlett-Packard Co. famously started in a Silicon Valley garage. Perhaps one day, ExactTarget’s humble beginnings—in $200-a-month space in a Greenfield business park—will be the subject of similar lore.

ExactTarget is no HP, at least not yet. But in just over a decade, the interactive marketer has rocketed from bootstrapped startup to New York Stock Exchange-listed company with a market value of $1.5 billion.

And spend a few minutes around Scott Dorsey, the company’s CEO and co-founder, and it’s clear he believes the company is just getting started. It expects to reach more than $275 million in revenue this year and is shooting for $1 billion, Dorsey told attendees of the Powder Keg tech startup conference Oct. 19.

The company started as a permission-based e-mail marketer, and it remains a leader in that field. But in recent years, it has broadened its marketing offerings beyond e-mail to help clients bond with customers through mobile, social media and websites.

To help establish itself as a one-stop shop for marketing technology needs, ExactTarget unveiled two major acquisitions this month. It paid $96 million for Atlanta-based Pardot LLC, broadening its reach into business-to-business digital marketing, and $21 million for Carmel-based iGoDigital, which helps companies like Amazon and Wal-Mart recommend products to customers based on their personal information, their previous buying habits and their online queries.

The deals brought 150 employees into the ExactTarget fold. The company now has 1,000 employees in Indianapolis and another 500 elsewhere in the United States and as far away as Brazil and Australia.

Dorsey Dorsey

It was just the kind of inspiring story budding tech entrepreneurs in the Powder Keg audience wanted to hear: an Indianapolis-based startup climbing to heights that would be impressive even in the technology hotbed of Silicon Valley.

“We were fortunate,” Dorsey said. “We got off to a fast start and really, really kept going.”

That’s not to say it was easy. Dorsey and co-founders Chris Baggott and Peter McCormick had to rely on friends-and-family funding for the first $200,000. (The group was richly rewarded: A $5,000 investment then now is worth $1 million.) And there was nothing glamorous about those early days. To prove its e-mail software actually worked, the company turned to Greenfield’s Mozzi’s Pizza chain, among other businesses in the area.

Dorsey doesn’t sound like a man who has let success get to his head. “Frankly, one of our strengths is, we just knew there was so much we didn’t know, and we were unbelievably open to feedback,” he said.

He said angel investor Bob Compton, one of ExactTarget’s early backers, was a key mentor, as were venture capitalists who started pumping money into the company in 2004. He said the outside investors “helped crack open our minds that this could be something far bigger than we had conceived of originally.”

Baggott, another Powder Keg speaker, said ExactTarget also benefited from being willing to make tough decisions early on, including replacing a succession of chief technology officers who didn’t work out—a gutsy move considering the founders didn’t have the tech expertise to step in themselves.

And some stumbles actually paid off in the long run. ExactTarget first filed to go public in 2007, but the financial crisis derailed that effort, prompting the company to turn to venture capitalists for additional funding.

It then made big investments in R&D that caused steep losses—a strategy public company investors probably would have punished. But by the time ExactTarget revived its IPO plans late last year, performance was on the upswing—and investors began lining up to buy the stock.

In its preliminary prospectus, ExactTarget projected the shares would fetch $15 to $17 apiece in the IPO. The company ended up pricing them at $19, and when the shares debuted March 22, the first trade was at $23.05.

Dorsey, who rang the opening bell on the New York Stock Exchange that day, recalls the IPO as an exhilarating, “out-of-body experience”—with a little confusion thrown in.

“For weeks, bankers were telling me, ‘Dorsey, you get to buy the first share. You get to buy the first share.’ I kept thinking, “How am I going to pay for it? Do I need to bring cash? Do I need to bring a check?’”

It turned out the purchase was ceremonial, not a real transaction, he said with a laugh.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT