R&D spending soars above value of new drugs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

To understand the depths of the pharmaceutical industry’s recent struggles, consider this: The industry has been spending $57 billion more per year on research and development than the value of the products it has been launching. That’s a problem.

The analysis comes from a June report by EvaluatePharma, a London-based research firm. It compared the value (calculated as future sales in today’s dollars) of products launched from 2008 to 2010—which came out to be $70 billion per year. The value of R&D spending during the same period: $127 billion per year.

“The Industry as a whole is not yet generating a return on R&D investment,” wrote Anthony Raeside, EvaluatePharma’s head of research. “Even if all R&D was successful, it is unlikely governments would be capable of reimbursing all new products. It is telling that when Pfizer announced the removal of $1.5 [billion] from its 2012 R&D spend, its stock price rose 5 percent. In an age of austerity, who will be next to wield the ax to their R&D budget?”

One quick answer: not Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. When the Reuters news agency asked Lilly CEO John Lechleieter about competitors cutting R&D spending, he said, "It's crazy; first of all, by definition this is a research-and-development-based industry.”

EvaluatePharma predicts overall prescription drug sales will rise 4 percent per year between now and 2016—an improvement from its year-ago forecast of 2.9 percent.

But the prediction still pegs the drug industry’s growth below the growth of the global economy in coming years.

Lilly, of course, has far worse problems than that, as it is losing patent protection on five of its best-selling drugs through 2014. EvaluatePharma predicts Lilly’s sales will shrink 4 percent per year between now and 2016.

In spite of that, Lilly plans to earmark as much as 25 percent of annual sales—or more than $5 billion a year—for research and development. Last year, Lilly spent $4.9 billion on R&D, which represented 21 percent of sales.

"Lilly is showing it is very committed to the innovative R&D model," JP Morgan analyst Chris Schott told Reuters.


  • War on Drugs
    Pharmaceutical companies cause OVER 100,000 deaths each year from the drugs they push on the public… that’s 10 times more deaths than from street drugs. Does EVERYone need a pill for something? The real drug cartels moving their product on unassuming victims are the Big Pharma Companies, averaging over $25 Billion in revenue EACH. Their agenda and money has corrupted Washington and the FDA. Voice your concern with me at http://tinyurl.com/3ut7m4z

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.