IBJNews

Receiver: Insolvent Hansen & Horn should be liquidated

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A receiver appointed in December to manage the assets of Hansen & Horn Group said Monday afternoon that the financially troubled home builder should be liquidated.

Attorneys for Ward and Stephen Horn, the father-and-son duo that operates Hansen & Horn, did not object to the recommendation made during a Marion Superior Court hearing.

Ward Horn declined to comment following the hearing.

Judge Heather A. Welch took the recommendation under advisement and will rule at a later date.

Welch in December selected Rick Lux of R.P. Lux Co., an Indianapolis-based real estate services firm, to operate the company as it attempted to avoid bankruptcy.

The judge’s order directed Lux to determine whether Hansen & Horn should remain in business, be partially liquidated, or completely liquidated.

The judge’s decision to appoint a receiver came one week after President Ward Horn admitted Hansen & Horn was insolvent.

A lawsuit brought by one of the home builder’s suppliers, Indianapolis-based C&R Concrete Inc., prompted the receivership. C&R is seeking to recover $268,749 for concrete work done during the past three years.

In all, Hansen & Horn is facing at least 20 lawsuits brought mostly by subcontractors hoping to recover more than $1 million.

Lux told the court on Monday that Hansen & Horn has assets of $7 million and liabilities of $14.5 million.

Once the judge issues her ruling, creditors will have 30 days to file a claim with the court to attempt to recover losses. Liquidation then would take about 90 days, said Trenton Hahn, a lawyer at Bose McKinney & Evans LLP who is representing Lux.

One creditor, Indianapolis-based Salin Bank and Trust Co., took issue with the proposed liquidation and requested the bank not be part of the receivership process.

Salin has loans to Hansen & Horn totaling $1.5 million, in which there is no equity, the bank’s attorney, Mike Lewinski of Ice Miller LLP, said. Further, the appraised value of the 49 home lots for which the loans were granted is just $950,000, he said.

“Salin would like to control its own destiny” and sell the properties on it own, Lewinski said. “Salin should not be harmed by the receiver’s actions, sequestering property for other creditors.”

But Hahn argued that, under law, a receiver has the right to sell the lots. Not being able to do so could negatively affect the developments, he said.

“There has been significant interest in these assets,” Hahn said.

Hansen & Horn has stopped building in more than 20 subdivisions in central Indiana, including the massive mixed-use Anson development in Boone County near Whitestown.

Founded in 1977, the company has regularly ranked among the top residential construction companies in the Indianapolis area over the past decade, building more than 200 homes during several of those years.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT