IBJNews

Remy International considering stock offering, CEO says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Pendleton-based Remy International Inc., the former General Motors Co. unit that exited bankruptcy in 2007, is considering a public offering of its stock this year, CEO John Weber says.

A stock sale is one financing option for the maker of alternators, starters and electric motors for hybrid cars, Weber said. Other options include a merger or an acquisition, he said. Remy shares now trade on the over-the-counter market. Sales are growing and the company is profitable, so Remy is looking for money to invest in strategic growth, he said.

“One of the alternatives we’re considering is an IPO, and part of the driver for that is that there are several strategic opportunities, both domestic and around the world, that we think would be a very good use of investors’ money,” Weber said. He declined to say on which exchange the shares may trade.

Remy may be among several auto-industry offerings this year. Chrysler Group LLC is planning to go public in the second half of this year. Billionaire Wilbur Ross’s International Automotive Components Group has hired banks for a 2011 share sale, a person familiar with the plan has said. Tesla Motors Inc. and GM last year held the first offerings by a U.S. automaker since 1956.

The automakers and suppliers are tapping into investor enthusiasm for the industry’s profitable growth after the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Ford earned $6.37 billion in the first three quarters of 2010, the most since 1998.

Remy had been among the auto suppliers expected to consider selling stock this year, Justin Mirro, managing director of Moelis & Co., a New York-based investment bank, said.

“The companies that would benefit most from an auto industry IPO would be those with hybrid technology, faster growth technologies, fuel economy, lightweight materials or those with a true global platform,” he said.

U.S. automobile sales increased 11 percent last year, to 11.6 million vehicles, from a 27-year low in 2009, Autodata Corp. said Jan. 4. Sales may rise to 12.9 million vehicles this year, according to the average of 17 analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg earlier this month, 23 percent fewer than the 16.8 million annual average from 2000 through 2007.

Remy, which makes parts for light- and heavy-duty vehicles as well as replacement parts, said net income was $13.8 million in the three months ended Sept. 30, compared with $2.6 million a year earlier, which excluded a one-time gain. Sales rose 25 percent, to $280 million. Remy plans to report fourth-quarter results March 17, Weber said.

Fidelity National Financial Inc., the largest U.S. title insurer, is Remy’s largest shareholder, with a 47-percent ownership stake, according to a statement. Remy  had about 10.6 million shares outstanding as of Sept. 30, and the average daily volume in the last three months is 2,967 shares.

After a rights offering that closed Jan. 18, Remy will have about 31.6 million shares outstanding. Daniel Murphy, Fidelity National’s treasurer, didn’t respond to an e-mail and voicemail seeking comment.

Through September, Remy received about 61 percent of its revenue from the U.S., the rest from countries including China, Brazil, South Korea and the U.K.

Remy is considering acquisitions in all countries where it operates and in either its aftermarket or original-equipment parts business units, Weber said. He declined to give a limit for how much Remy might spend on an acquisition.

“We’re willing to take on debt and raise additional equity for the right transaction,” he said.

Formerly known as Delco Remy, the company traces its roots to brothers Frank and Perry Remy, who developed magnetos, generators that used magnets to help start early automobiles. GM acquired Delco Remy in 1918 and spun it off in 1995. Remy changed its name to Remy International in 2004 and spent less than two months in bankruptcy in 2007.

Last year, the company refinanced its debt and started the process of eliminating its preferred class of shares.

“It’s a perfect position for the company for everything from acquisition to alliances to a registration,” Weber said. “It puts us in a perfect position to evaluate options.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT