IBJNews

Report: Charitable donations ticked up in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Charitable giving grew 4 percent nationally in 2011, but the increase was less than 1 percent after adjusting for inflation, according to a report released Tuesday by the Giving USA Foundation and The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Americans gave an estimated $298.4 billion to not-for-profits and religious organizations last year, the report says. Total donations were up from a revised $286.9 billion in 2010 and $280.3 billion 2009.

“It’s encouraging when we look at these numbers that total giving has increased for the second straight year,” said Una Osili, director of research at the IU center, “and we had one of the steepest declines in giving since World War II [during the recession].”

After accounting for inflation, researchers determined:

— Individual donations totaled $217.8 billion in 2011, increased 0.8 percent from 2010 and accounted for 73 percent of all gifts.

— Estate donations totaled $24.4 billion, increased 8.8 percent and accounted for 8 percent of all gifts.

— Foundation donations totaled $41.7 billion, decreased 1.3 percent and accounted for 14 percent of all gifts.

— Corporate donations totaled $14.5 billion, decreased 3.1 percent and accounted for 5 percent of all gifts.

Donations tend to follow the overall economy, Osili said, so as the nation slowly recovers, philanthropy is crawling back at a slight lag.

But “considerable uncertainty” remains about onging improvement, he said.

“Look at GDP, the stock market … many of those indicators continue to be somewhat volatile,” Osili said. “There’s likely going to be considerable uncertainty over what the future of giving will be next year.”

The growth rate in donations in 2010 and 2011 was less than half what it historically is after recessions.

In the two years after every recession in the past 40 years, charitable giving grew by an average of 2.6 percent after adjusting for inflation. After the most recent downturn, donations increased by 1.1 percent.

To summarize where the money went:

Religion was the biggest beneficiary of charitable giving, receiving $95.9 billion in 2011, which was 4.7 percent less than in 2010  and accounted for 32 percent of all gifts.

— Education received $38.9 billion, which was 0.9 percent more than in 2010, and accounted for 13 percent of all gifts.

— Foundations received $25.8 billion, 8.9 percent less and 9 percent of all gifts.

— Human services got $35.4 billion, 0.6 percent less and 12 percent of all gifts.

— Health received $24.8 billion, 0.4 percent less and 8 percent of all gifts.

— Public society-benefiting groups (such as United Way) got $21.4 billion, 0.9 percent more and 7 percent of all gifts.

— Arts, culture and humanities received $13.1 billion, 1 percent more and 4 percent of all gifts.

— International affairs got $22.7 billion, 4.4 percent more and 8 percent of all gifts.

— Environmental and animal organizations received $7.8 billion, 1.4 percent more and 3 percent of all gifts

— Individuals received $3.8 billion, 5.6 percent more and 1 percent of all gifts.

International affairs-related giving, once a blip in terms of total donations, has risen in recent years as the world becomes more connected via the Internet and social networks, Osili said. When news breaks about major natural disasters, especially, donations tend to surge.

Domestically, contributions have picked up for human services as people struggle with unemployment and other economic hardships, said Jim Yunker, chairman of the Giving USA Foundation.

Before accounting for inflation, the category took in 2.5 percent more money in 2011 than in 2010.

The problem, Yunker said, is that organizations such as food pantries and homeless shelters still can’t keep up with demand despite receiving more donations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT