IBJNews

Report: Charitable donations ticked up in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Charitable giving grew 4 percent nationally in 2011, but the increase was less than 1 percent after adjusting for inflation, according to a report released Tuesday by the Giving USA Foundation and The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Americans gave an estimated $298.4 billion to not-for-profits and religious organizations last year, the report says. Total donations were up from a revised $286.9 billion in 2010 and $280.3 billion 2009.

“It’s encouraging when we look at these numbers that total giving has increased for the second straight year,” said Una Osili, director of research at the IU center, “and we had one of the steepest declines in giving since World War II [during the recession].”

After accounting for inflation, researchers determined:

— Individual donations totaled $217.8 billion in 2011, increased 0.8 percent from 2010 and accounted for 73 percent of all gifts.

— Estate donations totaled $24.4 billion, increased 8.8 percent and accounted for 8 percent of all gifts.

— Foundation donations totaled $41.7 billion, decreased 1.3 percent and accounted for 14 percent of all gifts.

— Corporate donations totaled $14.5 billion, decreased 3.1 percent and accounted for 5 percent of all gifts.

Donations tend to follow the overall economy, Osili said, so as the nation slowly recovers, philanthropy is crawling back at a slight lag.

But “considerable uncertainty” remains about onging improvement, he said.

“Look at GDP, the stock market … many of those indicators continue to be somewhat volatile,” Osili said. “There’s likely going to be considerable uncertainty over what the future of giving will be next year.”

The growth rate in donations in 2010 and 2011 was less than half what it historically is after recessions.

In the two years after every recession in the past 40 years, charitable giving grew by an average of 2.6 percent after adjusting for inflation. After the most recent downturn, donations increased by 1.1 percent.

To summarize where the money went:

Religion was the biggest beneficiary of charitable giving, receiving $95.9 billion in 2011, which was 4.7 percent less than in 2010  and accounted for 32 percent of all gifts.

— Education received $38.9 billion, which was 0.9 percent more than in 2010, and accounted for 13 percent of all gifts.

— Foundations received $25.8 billion, 8.9 percent less and 9 percent of all gifts.

— Human services got $35.4 billion, 0.6 percent less and 12 percent of all gifts.

— Health received $24.8 billion, 0.4 percent less and 8 percent of all gifts.

— Public society-benefiting groups (such as United Way) got $21.4 billion, 0.9 percent more and 7 percent of all gifts.

— Arts, culture and humanities received $13.1 billion, 1 percent more and 4 percent of all gifts.

— International affairs got $22.7 billion, 4.4 percent more and 8 percent of all gifts.

— Environmental and animal organizations received $7.8 billion, 1.4 percent more and 3 percent of all gifts

— Individuals received $3.8 billion, 5.6 percent more and 1 percent of all gifts.

International affairs-related giving, once a blip in terms of total donations, has risen in recent years as the world becomes more connected via the Internet and social networks, Osili said. When news breaks about major natural disasters, especially, donations tend to surge.

Domestically, contributions have picked up for human services as people struggle with unemployment and other economic hardships, said Jim Yunker, chairman of the Giving USA Foundation.

Before accounting for inflation, the category took in 2.5 percent more money in 2011 than in 2010.

The problem, Yunker said, is that organizations such as food pantries and homeless shelters still can’t keep up with demand despite receiving more donations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT