IBJNews

Report: Charitable giving by Americans on the rise

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Americans gave an estimated $316.2 billion to charity last year, continuing a string of small philanthropic gains that reflect the country’s slow economic recovery, a new study says.

Giving by individuals, corporations and foundations was up 3.5 percent from 2011, or 1.5 percent after adjusting for inflation, according to research conducted at Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy on behalf of the Giving USA Foundation.

Released Tuesday, the annual Giving USA report is good news for the not-for-profit sector, which saw donations drop by 15 percent during the recession. At its peak, annual charitable giving surpassed $344 billion.

Giving USA has reported gains for three straight years.

“We have started to see a sustained recovery as it relates to giving,” said Una Osili, director of research at the IU philanthropy school. “The modest growth is actually quite encouraging.”

Even so, she said it could take another six or seven years to make up the lost ground at the current rate of growth.

The new report is the 58th edition of Giving USA, a public-service initiative of Chicago-based The Giving Institute.

Uncertainty over the future of the federal tax deduction for charitable gifts likely affected donations during 2012, institute board chairman David H. King said in a prepared statement. Some donors may have “prepaid” gifts to make sure they got the deduction, he said, while others may have opted against large gifts payable over several years.

But the state of the economy wields the most influence, given its connection to donors’ financial security.

Take corporate giving, which was up 9.9 percent last year after adjusting for inflation to an estimated $18.2 billion. It’s probably no coincidence that corporate pretax profits increased more than 16 percent during 2012, Usili said.

Individuals gave $228.9 billion in 2012, the new report found, up 1.9 percent after inflation adjustments. Foundations gave $45.7 billion, up 2.3 percent.

After accounting for inflation, researchers also estimated:

— Giving to arts, culture and humanities causes—hit hard during the recession—totaled $14.44 billion in 2012, a 5.7-percent increase.

— Giving to environmental and animal organizations totaled $8.3 billion, up 4.7 percent.

—Giving to education was $41.44 billion, up 4.9 percent.

— Giving to human services totaled $40.40 billion, up 1.8 percent.

— Giving to health organizations was $28.1 billion, up 2.8 percent.

— Giving to religion was $101.5 billion, a 2.2-percent drop. Even so, religious organizations received 32 percent of all U.S. giving in 2012, the report said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT