IBJNews

Report: Investigators tailed Libman before resignation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Carmel hired private investigators to tail Steven Libman, the former CEO of the Center for the Performing Arts in Carmel, because of concerns of possible misuse of city funds, sexual harassment and sexual intimidation, Fox59 is reporting.

The station, IBJ's news-gathering partner, said invoices for more than $8,000 of surveillance by private investigators were filed with the city in July, the second of them less than two weeks before Libman abruptly resigned on July 29.

Citing undisclosed personal reasons, Libman stepped down less than three months after his contract had been extended through 2016. A voicemail message left for Libman on Tuesday morning was not immediately returned.

According to e-mails obtained by WXIN-TV Channel 59, Carmel Mayor Jim Brainard told Carmel city councilors that “individuals came to us—concerned that city funds were misused. It was of great concern that foundation funds were at risk … as well as sexual harassment and sexual intimidation. … [The] police chief was informed … but not requested to investigate."

Instead, city attorney Douglas Haney hired Indianapolis-based International Investigators Inc., according to invoices signed by Haney. The invoices have the name of the target of the investigation redacted, but Fox59 cited a source close to the probe who said Libman was the target.

Haney, who was appointed by Brainard, is also a member of the board of the Center for the Performing Arts. The $175 million complex kicked off the inaugural season of its largest theater, the Palladium, in January.

A call to Haney’s office was not immediately returned Tuesday morning. A call to Brainard was referred to Carmel’s community relations department, which did not respond immediately.

According to the e-mails cited by Fox59, Brainard told city councilors, "The city attorney conducted his own investigation because he needed to prove or disprove these serious concerns that put the city at risk."

Libman, who took the helm of the center in September 2009, was paid $200,000 in his first year as CEO. The Palladium hosted 24 shows in its inaugural season, selling about 96 percent of available seats and grossing $1.67 million in revenue.

Since Libman’s departure, Frank Basile, a center board member, has been serving as interim CEO. Basile told IBJ  in late July that the board plans to use the same search committee that found Libman two years ago. He said he hoped the search would last just a few months.

Reached by phone Tuesday morning, Basile said he had just had a meeting discussing the investigation and what information had gone out about Libman. However, he declined to comment beyond an Aug. 1 statement he gave to stakeholders of the center, acknowledging that there were many questions about Libman’s resignation. He asked for understanding about the need to respect an employee’s privacy.

"I’m sure you can appreciate that I will not satisfy everyone’s curiosity," Basile wrote, adding, “As is common when any organization is faced with an unexpected executive-level resignation, I have started a review of all internal operations at the Center. As the interim President/CEO, my goal is to maintain a smooth transition for the day-to-day operations.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Libman's Invaluable Asset to Performing Arts Center
    A cursory investigation into Mr. Libman's qualifications to be the CEO of the Performing Arts Center reveals a life-long career in performing arts: Opera, Ballet, Theatre, and now the PAC of Carmel, Indiana. Having had the privilege of conversing with Mr. Libman over a 20 year period, I know that he has a sacred passion to advance the arts AND benefit the community that he serves by presenting the highest possible artistic performances. I've been to Lincoln Center. Isn't it a shame that the Mayor decided to harass the one and only person who could have possibly effected the building and opening and staffing and providing quality talent for Carmel's PAC? Yes, a shame. Mr. Libman is a good man AND he is a genius at presenting the perfect spaces for the perfect artists. You will never find a person with equal passion and integrity and commitment to the arts and the community in which it is performed. Watch the interview with Steven Libman on You Tube and judge for yourself. You had a star with a heart and a vision and apparently some people in Carmel, IN,decided to throw it all away. What a crime. Just think, you have a Lincoln Center right in your backyard, and soon you'll have to fly to the Lincoln Center to see anything comparable. Shame.
  • COI?
    If Haney is the city attorney, the city is his client, not the mayor. If Haney was aware of alleged illegal activity (misuse of city funds), did he not have a duty to report it to the city police? Who's interest was Haney protecting, the mayor's or his "client," the city's? I hope that the media follows through on this story and gets some answers.
  • I Knew Something Was Up
    The day Steven's resignation was announced I knew there was more to the story. Now we are hearing about it. Scandal is everywhere amoungst us, just surprised that a Brainard scandal wasn't first.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT