IBJNews

Residents decry Fortville's big annexation plans as land grab

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Property owners in a largely agricultural area southeast of Geist Reservoir are vowing to fight involuntary annexation by the town of Fortville, calling the plan a blatant land grab.

Fortville is seeking to annex almost 6,000 acres to the west, tripling the size of the Hancock County town and adding $53.5 million to its property tax base.

Fortville annexation mapTown officials did not respond to inquiries from IBJ, but a summary of Fortville’s fiscal plan for providing services to the targeted territory described the annexation as “a means for providing for the orderly and planned growth of the municipality.”

Opponents see the proposal as a desperate effort to capture additional tax revenue for the town, which has seen income drop as the result of statewide property tax caps. But adding 9 square miles of territory—and the associated services—doesn’t make sense if Fortville is having trouble making ends meet now, they say.

“Annexation is expensive,” said opposition leader Florence May, who lives in the targeted area despite her McCordsville mailing address. “We think it’s a pretty major stretch.”

The area targeted for annexation has 240 homes and businesses—mostly farms—and an estimated population of 600, according to the town’s fiscal plan summary.

Landowners began mobilizing in late March, when they learned about the proposal via certified letter notifying them of a May 29 public hearing.

About a week later, the first meeting of a group now calling itself Fight Against Fortville Annexation drew more than 100 people to Gary Kingen’s farm at the southwest edge of the targeted territory, six miles from the current town limits.

Residents compiled a list of concerns about the proposal. Chief among them: the absence of a comprehensive development plan for Fortville and the annexation area, and a lack of confidence in town officials’ ability to manage such ambitious, immediate growth.

fortville annexation florence may 15colFlorence May, left, and Gary Kingen worry about the lack of long-term planning in Fortville's annexation bid. (IBJ photo/Perry Reichanadter)

“This is an annexation with no purpose or direction other than raking money into the Fortville town coffers,” May said.

Town attorney Alex Intermill told the Greenfield Daily Reporter that the annexation is a bet on land that is likely to be developed soon, given its location between Fishers and Interstate 70.

“That’s where we see the growth coming,” he said.

Indeed, Fortville’s fiscal plan—approved unanimously at a March 26 special meeting of the five-member Town Council—calls for developers to cover most of the costs of extending municipal services to the annexation area within the required three years.

The town estimates it won’t have any financial obligations for providing sanitary sewers and water service, for example, and the plan says gravel roads in the annexation area will be improved as development occurs.

Police protection is expected to cost an additional $15,000 a year.

Hancock County would continue to handle zoning duties in Fortville and the annexation area, according to the plan, and the Vernon Township Fire Department will keep providing fire and emergency medical services.

All told, Fortville expects to spend an additional $245,000 in the first year of annexation, when associated revenue is expected to increase about $420,500.

Although the tax caps would limit the impact on most property owners, May said the town’s tax levy would reduce funding for other taxing units—including the cash-strapped Mount Vernon Community School Corp.

Indeed, while the property tax caps the Legislature passed in 2008 provided relief to homeowners, they have strained public budgets that counted on that revenue. State Rep. Bob Cherry, R-Greenfield, said more communities are turning to annexation as a solution, seeking to add revenue by expanding their tax bases.

Cherry co-sponsored a Senate bill that sought to limit the scope of such growth, but it failed to pass out of the House during the most recent legislative session. An interim study committee is expected to review the annexation process this summer as a compromise.

“Usually, you have annexation where growth is occurring and people want services,” said Cherry, who does not represent Fortville but is nevertheless familiar with the plans. “In these kind of annexations, you’re getting the cart before the horse.”

The so-called “western boundary” area Fortville is seeking to annex would increase its total assessed valuation 53 percent, far exceeding the 15-percent limit proposed in the Senate measure.

Cherry said the Legislature needs to address the tax-cap issue and the impact it is having on municipal budgets.

“If I were king, I would put a moratorium on annexations until we can get back and look at fixing the tax problem,” he said. “Some communities think this is the solution, but it’s not.”

A routine State Board of Accounts audit of Fortville finances for 2009 and 2010, the most recent available, found “several deficiencies” in the town’s internal controls over financial transactions and reporting. It cited a lack of segregation of duties in the clerk-treasurer’s office and a lack of oversight by the Town Council.

The audit also noted the town spent $111,475 on police vehicles with no evidence that it solicited bids.

May said the past missteps make residents question officials’ ability to handle more.

“We don’t want to see good money go after bad money,” she said. “We want to see a plan that shows some prayer of responsible use.”

Fortville’s Town Council is scheduled to discuss the annexation proposal at its meeting next week, but May said opponents will not be allowed to speak. Still, they’re hoping to make their case before the public hearing at the end of the month.

Town leaders must wait at least 30 days after the May 29 hearing to vote on the proposed annexation. If the ordinance is approved, property owners can file a formal remonstrance with the court.

May said most residents believe annexation is inevitable, given the proximity to Indianapolis.  But they point to the more measured growth occurring in nearby McCordsville as an example of a smart strategy.   

“My hope would be that Fortville learns from this experience and can develop a well-thought-out vision,” she said. “That’s what they’re lacking. There’s not even a vision to build a plan around.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Make it a TIF and Mayor Ballard can HIJACK THE TAX DOUGH FOR HIS BUDDIES!
    Maybe Mayor Marine can convert it to a TIF and syphon the tax revenue off the tax rolls and pay off his buddies Chicago style!
  • Agree (Taxes are out of control)
    I live in the downtown area of Indianapolis and my taxes went up over a $1000 on one house to $4000 annually while I paid 70K for it. Don't get me wrong its probable worth 200k max but $4000 for one house.....
  • Agree with Tom
    My last reassessment (there have been three since we bought the house in 2011), I told the assessor that if he had a BUYER for the amount he was assessing to have them come write me a check and we would move tomorrow. 15% increase in 1.5 years is NOT a cap.
    • Developers to fund municipal improvements?
      This is a rural area. Have any developers come to the Town of Fortville to display their development plans within the annexation area to support this three (3) year time horizon? Seems foolish for the municipality to count on developers to do their work for them when they are unknown entities at this juncture. What happens when the developments don't happen in this rural area?
    • Are You Surprised?
      The legislature inserted an arbitrary "cap" on the percentage of property taxes, but did not limit the frequency with which property can be reassessed. Result? Everybody's property is getting re-assessed basically every year, and lo and behold, despite a five year real-estate bear market, everybody's valuation magically rises every single year, like clockwork. Result? You get a tax increase every single year even as our leaders crow on about the "cap" they've put on our property taxes.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

    ADVERTISEMENT