River protest set for proposed central Indiana reservoir

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Opponents of a major reservoir being proposed in central Indiana are planning a protest aimed at highlighting what the project would put under water.

The newly formed Heart of the River Coalition will hold what it calls a "protest paddle" starting from Daleville on Saturday, with kayakers and canoeists covering several miles of the White River near Anderson, The Herald Bulletin reported.. Organizer and environmentalist Clarke Kahlo said the group is trying to build public awareness of what would disappear if the reservoir is built.

The proposed Mounds Lake Reservoir, estimated to cost between $300 million and $400 million to build, would back up 7 miles of the river in Madison and Delaware counties, covering about 2,100 acres. That's slightly larger than Geist Reservoir near Indianapolis.

Kahlo and other river advocates are concerned about the thousands of acres of private and public land that would be flooded, including a significant portion of Mounds State Park, about 25 miles northeast of Indianapolis.

"Not only will it heavily impact the significant historical and cultural resources in the area, but the high financial burden to massively reconfigure existing infrastructure, utilities, roads, and bridges has not been thoroughly examined or publicly vetted," Kahlo said.

Advocates of the project say creating the new reservoir would improve flood control, create prime real estate for waterfront housing and boost property values and economic development in the Anderson area. The reservoir could also provide bike paths, fishing and other recreational activities for the public, and help supplement water needs in the Indianapolis metropolitan area.

The Daleville and Chesterfield town councils have approved non-binding resolutions of support for continued study of the proposal. The county commissioners for Madison and Delaware counties are expected to consider similar resolutions next week.

Rob Sparks, executive director of the Anderson-Madison County Corp. for Economic Development, said he hoped to meet soon with Kahlo and his group to discuss their concerns. Support for the project has been building.

Sparks said the reservoir would create a new environment, ecosystem and habitat for wildlife and stabilize river flow during times of drought.


  • what are we waiting for?
    Has anyone looked at the area that they are wanting to flood?? What are we waiting for? Flood it and watch the city rebuild to a much better place to live. I am a resident of the area and the city has nothing to offer.
  • Same old story.
    Same kind of Luddites who oppose I-69. Guessing their 501(c)(4) application probably sailed right through the IRS.
  • Speculation
    I wonder which of the altruistic industry/civic leaders who are promoting this plan have tied up cheap land purchase options on the "prime waterfront real estate" surrounding this future reservoir?
  • kahlo
    There is always someone protesting about something. This person is no different she just wants her 15 minutes of fame. People like her need not to speak for people like me. I like the idea and I say let's go for it. Kahlo if you don't then we can call u a cab and send some u hauls to ya.
  • Anyone want to ask Mr. Kahlo where he gets his water from? I am betting it is from a man made structure, be it the canal or one of the reservoirs.
  • I think this project looks great
    "build public awareness of the amount of land that would disappear if the reservoir is built." Yes, but for every acre of land that disappears, an acre of water appears! Seems like a good tradeoff, especially going into the future. We've already outstripped our water reserve supplies multiple times in recent years.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...