IBJNews

Rivoli Theatre finally cleared for comeback

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A legal battle that had threatened the landmark Rivoli Theatre has been settled, and a $300,000 grant has been secured to begin stabilizing the East 10th Street structure.

The Rivoli Center for the Performing Arts Inc., the not-for-profit that owns the building at 3155 E. 10th St., on June 8 cleared what it believes will be the last legal hurdle posed by Charles R. Chulchian, the one-time owner of the property.

REW_rivoli_15colRenovations will begin with the roof, which is in danger of caving in. (IBJ Photo/Perry Reichanadter)

Chulchian, who bought the theater in 1976, gifted it to the not-for-profit in 2007 but retained a partial interest, which had complicated efforts to improve the structure. In February, he agreed to surrender his interest in the property, but in April he resurrected his effort to intervene in the Rivoli’s future, sending the ownership dispute back to court.

A judge’s order reaffirming the February agreement will allow work to begin on the 1927 movie house, which is expected to become a catalyst for further redevelopment of the East 10th Street corridor, the stretch adopted by organizers of Super Bowl XLVI.

The first order of business is to replace the roof, which is in danger of caving in. The city has agreed to devote federal Community Development Block Grant funds to the project.

The grant recipient is the East 10th Street Civic Association, which is partnering with Keystone Construction on the project. Tammi Hughes, executive director of the civic association, said Keystone will be the construction manager and will donate its fee to the effort.

“It’s been 10 years of start and stop,” said Hughes, noting that while her organization has been trying to save the building for about a decade, the community’s efforts go back much further. “We’re absolutely thrilled to have the city on board as a partner.” City officials involved in making the grant were not available to comment.

Hughes’ group is in the process of securing an engineering firm to do a final evaluation of the roof. That should happen in August, followed by Keystone’s work. The roof is expected to be replaced by December.

As that work progresses, the civic association will work with the Rivoli board to convene stakeholders to revisit what the building might become, Hughes said. Unless that process results in a shift in direction, the Rivoli could pattern itself after the Little Black Pearl Art and Design Center on Chicago’s south side. Rivoli advocates visited Little Black Pearl a few years ago and came away impressed with its role as a cultural arts center providing performance space, studio space, practice rooms and other arts opportunities for children and families.

Hughes said once her group and the Rivoli board agree on a direction for the Rivoli, they’ll be able to assess how much money it will take to prepare the building for its new role in the community.

The Rivoli, at 10th and Dearborn streets, is expected to anchor one of three redevelopment nodes along the corridor. The others, at 10th and Jefferson and 10th and Rural, benefitted from significant public and private investment leading up to the Super Bowl last February.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Mr. O'Hara
    Thank you for sharing some of your memories from the building. My Mom graduated from Tech in 1943. She has many wonderful memories of the Rivoli. Please keep in touch with our group. You can find out about membership at RivoliTheatre.org. Click on support.Board meetings are held the first Wed. of each month at 6 PM at the John Boner Center, second floor. Visitors are always welcome.
  • Awesome!!
    Such great news!! Great job to all those working to make this happen!!
  • Fabulous News
    I lived in the corner apartment over the Rivioli during 1943 to 1946 and my mother was the cashier at the theatre which at that time was run my the Cantor family along with most of the smaller theatres in town. I am so glad to see this project moving forward and hope that the group does not forget the history that goes with this building. I can recall many good events while I lived there but most importantly when my father returned from China at the end of the Second World War.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT