IBJNews

Rural broadband provider Omnicity racks up legal bills tied to acquisitions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Omnicity Inc.’s business plan is to snap up rural broadband systems throughout the Midwest. Lately, however, it’s been accumulating more in the way of lawsuits.

The latest of at least five suits filed since early last year involves Columbus, Ohio-based SZD Whiteboard, a consulting firm that says Omnicity defaulted on a promissory note.

Whiteboard seeks $134,737 plus 8-percent annual interest on the note, issued last year in return for consulting services to help Omnicity identify and acquire wireless providers in rural Ohio.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on June 21 entered a judgment in favor of Whiteboard, according to court records.

Whiteboard pointed to Omnicity’s recent financial statements, which included a $418,290 loss in its most recent quarter, ended Jan. 31. Rushville-based Omnicity had a working capital deficit of $4.2 million and stockholders’ deficit of $2 million.Omnicity.gif

“All of these factors combined raises substantial doubt regarding the company’s ability to continue as a going concern,” Omnicity stated in its most recent financial report filed in May.

Whiteboard also asked the court for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent Omnicity from transferring collateral pledged on the note.

Judge Michael Watson scheduled a hearing on the request for June 29. But Watson ruled just before the hearing, as Omnicity officials were on their way to Columbus, to stay the request by Whiteboard, pending mediation.

Alan Starkoff, an attorney for Whiteboard, said he was unsure why the court chose mediation.

Omnicity has been held out as a promising growth company.

Last year, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered up to $25,000 in training grants toward an expansion in Rushville.

The IEDC also provided a $110,000 grant to Rushville officials to help the company with its expansion. The company has about 45 employees.

Much of Omnicity’s business involves delivering Internet service via wireless signals. Omnicity said it had 10,600 active subscribers on Jan. 31, built mainly through acquisitions.

But Omnicity has rankled some of the ex-owners of broadband firms it acquired along the way.

Lawsuits filed in Rush County and in Holmes County, Ohio, by four owners of companies Omnicity purchased allege Omnicity failed to fully pay them for the acquisitions. Collectively, they claim they’re owed more than $1.2 million.

Among them was Steve Narducci, who sold his Alexandria-based NDWave LLC to Omnicity in early 2009 and was hired by Omnicity as part of the deal.

Last year, Narducci filed suit, alleging Omnicity owes him more than $405,000, plus interest.

Kyle Yoder, former owner of Digital Network Solutions, in Berlin, Ohio, also sued last year.

Yoder said Omnicity gave him $700,000 in cash but failed to pay him the installment on a $500,000 promissory note. He alleges that triggered a clause that made the entire amount due immediately. He’s also seeking a $50,000 payment he agreed to defer, and $150,000 in company stock.

Omnicity has been fighting back against both men.

In a countersuit filed earlier this year, Omnicity alleged Narducci breached his contract and fiduciary duty and defamed it by telling certain companies that it was on the “verge of bankruptcy.”

Narducci was terminated by Omnicity, and later formed a competing company. He refuted Omnicity’s charges, telling IBJ earlier this year, “I had to find a way to make a living again.”

Omnicity also filed a countersuit against Yoder, alleging he breached his contract and non-compete clause, failed to pay vendors, and refused to provide the company with terms and conditions of customer contracts.

“In both these cases, we have not gotten what we purchased,” Omnicity CEO Greg Jarman told IBJ last February.

Omnicity’s vice president of business development and corporate partnerships, David Waddell, characterized the Whiteboard suit as “a simple disagreement between two companies.”

Waddell said the litigation in the last two years masks the progress Omnicity is making. Its revenue grew to $1.2 million in the first quarter of this year, from $635,946 for the same period in 2010.

He also pointed to progress in bringing broadband to underserved rural areas, such as Columbiana County, Ohio, where Omnicity plans to offer service to more than 300 homes from a 250-foot tower.

“Our business model has proven itself,” Waddell said, saying a new round of acquisition announcements was forthcoming.

In February, Rush Superior Court ordered Omnicity to pay $67,500 to owners of USppp Inc., which Omnicity bought in 2009.

It’s also been behind in loan payments to the Muncie Industrial Revolving Loan Fund.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT