November 20, 2012
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

-AEI Fund Management bought a 15,443-square-foot retail property at 8245 E. 96th St., Fishers. The buyer was represented by Andy Bogardus of Cassidy Turley. The seller, TF Development LLC, was represented by Bill French of Cassidy Turley.

-S&S Indy LLC bought 24 acres of industrial land at 4800 S. Harding St. The buyer was represented by Jim Karozos of Lee & Associates. The seller, Herriman Keeler & Teuton, was represented by Herb Feldmann of Lee & Associates.

-S&S Indy LLC bought 5.9 acres of industrial land at 4585 and 4600 S. Harding St. The buyer was represented by Jim Karozos of Lee & Associates. The seller, Chaudhary & Singh, was represented by Bina Ahluwalia of Bina Real Estate.

-T. Thompson Properties LLC bought 40 acres of land at 9700 Pentecost Road and 11.92 acres of land at 5700 S. Emerson Ave. The buyer was represented by  Billy Bemis of Bemis Group. The seller, Horizon Bank, was represented by Cathy Richards and Mike Kensill of Lee & Associates.


Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.