Scholarship bill raises questions about minors on campus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As Indiana lawmakers ponder a bill that would give high school students an incentive to graduate early, state university leaders are bracing for the possible impact—an influx of minors onto their campuses.

Students younger than 18 can present legal, educational and social issues more complex than those that accompany their adult counterparts.

It’s a matter that could arise Wednesday when the Indiana Senate’s education and career development committee takes up the bill, which would grant students who graduate before 12th grade a $3,500 scholarship. The proposal is expected to be amended Wednesday, but not voted on by the committee.

The "minor" factor is less a legislative issue than it is a logistical maze that universities would have to navigate if the bill passes and a lot of students take advantage of it. The possibility raises many questions.

“Where will they be living? What does that mean for their interaction? Who becomes the guardian?” said Melissa Exum, vice president of student affairs at Purdue University in West Lafayette. “If we see hundreds of students coming in, we have to start asking these questions.”

Schools such as Purdue already have some minor students on campus. But their numbers are so small that those topics tend to be handled on a case-by-case basis. Hundreds of students, however, would be a different matter.

Among the most complicated issues to sort out is guardianship. Who claims responsibility for the student, for example, if parents are hours away and the student encounters legal or medical trouble?

It also could influence interactions in the classroom. Under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act, 18-year-olds have ownership rights to their academic records, but parents still have a stake in minors' records, which gives them the right to inquire about their student’s academic performance.

“I don’t think we want a professor to know that a student is younger in terms of their expectations of them,” said Dale Whittaker, Purdue’s vice provost for undergraduate academic affairs. “So when a parent calls and says, 'did my student show up for class today', that presents an awkward situation.”

The same issue could apply in a school clinic setting, where medical privacy rights are different for adults and minors.

Boarding schools with students younger than 18 grapple with these kinds of issues, too. But it’s more complicated for universities, which are used to dealing with an adult population, to sort out how to handle two different student populations.

Kay Bales, vice president of student affairs at Ball State University, said via e-mail that college life is “based on the expectation that the majority of the population is comprised of adults.”

“The traditional university setting offers students a tremendous amount of freedom and may not currently have a level of supervision that minor students or their parents might expect,” Bales said.

She added that it’s too soon to say how the school would deal with a deluge of minors but that all university policies and procedures would be reviewed should the bill become law.

Ball State already has a template for hosting minors on campus. Its Indiana Academy for gifted high school upperclassmen is located on campus, but Bales said the student population is largely isolated from the university’s undergraduates—with separate housing and student life.

Separating students, however, requires resources, such as building space and advisers to staff the buildings and plan social activites. And, for minors who are essentially college freshman, calling that kind of attention to them could cause more trouble than benefit, Exum said.

Sen. Dennis Kruse, the lawmaker who authored the bill, said he has concerns about some of those issues. But, ultimately, he said, it’s up to universities to figure out the best ways to accommodate the new population—and parents to decide whether their students are mature enough to enter the college environment.
While it would require a lot of time and effort, the university administrators say they’d be up to the task.

“Taking on these kids is not easy, and it will entail some expertise and extra monitoring,” said Jeff Linder, Indiana University’s associate vice president for government relations. “(But) we are there to provide the best opportunities for the students who are really ready to take that extra step and excel.”


  • What about extending ACP?
    IU ACP classes are already in place in many high schools, where students can earn college credit for certain high school courses by paying an extra fee. For the students who will be minors if they started early on campus, perhaps IU could accredit more ACP courses and the minor students could use the scholarship money to pay the fees to do their first year of college in their high school as their fourth h.s. year. This would remove the problem of masses of minors on campus. I'm sure a few minor students would still be able to come to campus (for example, those who are doing programs for engineering that are not offered in high schools) but since at IU most students spend their first year doing their required composition, math, history etc., it makes a lot of sense to merge the first year of h.s. with the 4th year of college.

    32 years ago I was 16 and living on a college campus. The issues of minor students did not seem to be so much of an issue.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. what Steve is doing and if he is on another radio station. That is the station I will listen to.

  2. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  3. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  4. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  5. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.