IBJNews

Scholarship bill raises questions about minors on campus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As Indiana lawmakers ponder a bill that would give high school students an incentive to graduate early, state university leaders are bracing for the possible impact—an influx of minors onto their campuses.

Students younger than 18 can present legal, educational and social issues more complex than those that accompany their adult counterparts.

It’s a matter that could arise Wednesday when the Indiana Senate’s education and career development committee takes up the bill, which would grant students who graduate before 12th grade a $3,500 scholarship. The proposal is expected to be amended Wednesday, but not voted on by the committee.

The "minor" factor is less a legislative issue than it is a logistical maze that universities would have to navigate if the bill passes and a lot of students take advantage of it. The possibility raises many questions.

“Where will they be living? What does that mean for their interaction? Who becomes the guardian?” said Melissa Exum, vice president of student affairs at Purdue University in West Lafayette. “If we see hundreds of students coming in, we have to start asking these questions.”

Schools such as Purdue already have some minor students on campus. But their numbers are so small that those topics tend to be handled on a case-by-case basis. Hundreds of students, however, would be a different matter.

Among the most complicated issues to sort out is guardianship. Who claims responsibility for the student, for example, if parents are hours away and the student encounters legal or medical trouble?

It also could influence interactions in the classroom. Under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act, 18-year-olds have ownership rights to their academic records, but parents still have a stake in minors' records, which gives them the right to inquire about their student’s academic performance.

“I don’t think we want a professor to know that a student is younger in terms of their expectations of them,” said Dale Whittaker, Purdue’s vice provost for undergraduate academic affairs. “So when a parent calls and says, 'did my student show up for class today', that presents an awkward situation.”

The same issue could apply in a school clinic setting, where medical privacy rights are different for adults and minors.

Boarding schools with students younger than 18 grapple with these kinds of issues, too. But it’s more complicated for universities, which are used to dealing with an adult population, to sort out how to handle two different student populations.

Kay Bales, vice president of student affairs at Ball State University, said via e-mail that college life is “based on the expectation that the majority of the population is comprised of adults.”

“The traditional university setting offers students a tremendous amount of freedom and may not currently have a level of supervision that minor students or their parents might expect,” Bales said.

She added that it’s too soon to say how the school would deal with a deluge of minors but that all university policies and procedures would be reviewed should the bill become law.

Ball State already has a template for hosting minors on campus. Its Indiana Academy for gifted high school upperclassmen is located on campus, but Bales said the student population is largely isolated from the university’s undergraduates—with separate housing and student life.

Separating students, however, requires resources, such as building space and advisers to staff the buildings and plan social activites. And, for minors who are essentially college freshman, calling that kind of attention to them could cause more trouble than benefit, Exum said.

Sen. Dennis Kruse, the lawmaker who authored the bill, said he has concerns about some of those issues. But, ultimately, he said, it’s up to universities to figure out the best ways to accommodate the new population—and parents to decide whether their students are mature enough to enter the college environment.
While it would require a lot of time and effort, the university administrators say they’d be up to the task.

“Taking on these kids is not easy, and it will entail some expertise and extra monitoring,” said Jeff Linder, Indiana University’s associate vice president for government relations. “(But) we are there to provide the best opportunities for the students who are really ready to take that extra step and excel.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What about extending ACP?
    IU ACP classes are already in place in many high schools, where students can earn college credit for certain high school courses by paying an extra fee. For the students who will be minors if they started early on campus, perhaps IU could accredit more ACP courses and the minor students could use the scholarship money to pay the fees to do their first year of college in their high school as their fourth h.s. year. This would remove the problem of masses of minors on campus. I'm sure a few minor students would still be able to come to campus (for example, those who are doing programs for engineering that are not offered in high schools) but since at IU most students spend their first year doing their required composition, math, history etc., it makes a lot of sense to merge the first year of h.s. with the 4th year of college.

    32 years ago I was 16 and living on a college campus. The issues of minor students did not seem to be so much of an issue.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT