School moving to vacant downtown building

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A small private school that serves gifted and talented students intends to move to a downtown building that has been vacant since a daycare center moved out three years ago.

Todd Academy plans to move this month to the 16,000-square-foot former Day Nursery Association building at 855 N. East St. The school is leaving a 5,000-square-foot building owned by the local real estate firm Axia Urban at 302 N. East St. in Lockerbie Square.

Sharon Todd, executive director of the school, said the two-year term of the lease will give the school just enough time to identify another downtown building that it can buy, renovate and occupy as a permanent home.

The school, which serves about 30 students in grades five through 12, has grown from just two students when it was founded in 2002. The downtown location is important because of its proximity to IUPUI, where several students in the school take early college courses.

“Downtown has become their place,” Todd said of her students, who come from nine counties in the Indianapolis area. “They are suburban kids who aren’t used to walking,” she said. But they’ve discovered they can walk between Todd Academy and IUPUI when the weather allows.

The 1.8-acre site comes with 32 parking spaces and will accommodate some outdoor recreational facilities that Todd Academy students haven’t had, Todd said.

Terms of the lease, other than the two-year duration, weren’t divulged, but Todd described the rent as “way below” market. The asking price online was $9.75 a square foot.

The owner of the property, a partnership led by Paul M. VeZolles of Charlotte, N.C., bought it in 2009 for almost $828,000.

VeZolles, an Indianapolis native, said the lease isn’t signed but he’s hopeful it will be finalized soon. He said the school would be a good placeholder for the property until he can put together a redevelopment plan, which he said would likely include a mix of single-family and multi-family housing.

The site is in the Chatham Arch historic district, where improvements are governed by the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission. VeZolles’ property is bounded on the east by Park Avenue, which is populated with a mix of new and historic single-family homes and duplexes that look out on the former daycare center.

VeZolles said his goal is to develop the property in a way that neighbors will agree is a benefit to the area.

In the near term, neighbors might benefit from the school. Todd said students are required to perform between and 10 and 20 hours a month of community service and in the past have participated in activities of the Lockerbie Square neighborhood to fulfill that requirement.

She wants to occupy the building before school ends June 10 so that parents of prospective students can see where their children would be attending class.

Todd is represented by Joseph Barney of Indianapolis Downtown Real Estate. VeZolles’ broker is Rob Lukemeyer of Baseline Commercial real estate.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.