IBJNews

SEC accuses local firm of bilking investors out of $1.7M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local investment firm accused of bilking clients out of more than $1.7 million is the target of a civil lawsuit filed Monday by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Rykoworks Capital Group LLC in Brownsburg and its owner, Ryan W. Koester, 40, are named in the suit, in addition to Trafalgar insurance salesman Rudolf D. Pameijer, 61, and his daughter Lindsay R. Sayer, 32.

Without admitting or denying the allegations, Pameijer and Sayer already have agreed to waive their right to a jury trial and entered into a settlement that permanently prevents them from providing investment advice in the future. They also could be ordered to repay victims with additional civil penalties.

The SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis accuses the trio of committing securities fraud by misappropriating investor funds for their personal use. Pameijer used the money for luxury automobiles, a motorcycle, a 30-foot boat, his son’s college tuition, a car for Sayer and various home renovations, the suit said. It said he also used funds to pay for Sayer's wedding and her honeymoon in St. Lucia.

The suit stems from an investigation by the Indiana Secretary of State's office in which Rykoworks and Pameijer's Plan America LLC in Indianapolis had their assets frozen.

Koester, Pameijer and Sayer were not licensed to provide investment advice or to sell securities in Indiana, the securities division said.

The SEC alleges that the scheme began when Pameijer, a career insurance salesman, met Koester at a marketing event in October 2009. At the event, Koester held himself out as an expert foreign currency trader, prompting Pameijer to ultimately enter into a profit-sharing agreement with Koester for clients Pameijer brought to Rykoworks.

Pameijer and Sayer began soliciting clients in October 2010 to invest with Rykoworks through promissory notes that purported to guarantee 12-percent returns, the lawsuit claims.

“Many of the investors were unsophisticated,” the complaint said, “and some included friends and family of Pameijer.”

The largest defrauded investors were a retired scrap metal worker and his wife, who gave Pameijer $1.1 million, the complaint said.

Pameijer and Sayer transferred remaining investor funds that they did not misappropriate to Koester and Rykoworks, which Koester depleted through trading losses and personal expenses. Koester also misappropriated additional funds that he raised directly from investors, according to the SEC.

As part of the scheme, the trio provided false account statements and information to investors, the suit said.

By fall 2011, Pameijer urgently sought to raise additional funds from new investors. But Koester eventually became unresponsive to Pameijer, and Pameijer told clients that Koester had absconded with their funds, the complaint alleges.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • do your homework
    “Many of the investors were unsophisticated,” the complaint said, “and some included friends and family of Pameijer.” --------------- This quote says it all. Anyone that thinks 12 percent returns can be guaranteed is going to get whats coming to them. The SEC too often gives consumers a false sense of security. With bad apples like this advisor it gets more people thinking more regulation is the answer. All more regulation does is make people think they are safer while increasing costs and preventing good advisors from growing their business

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT