IBJNews

SEC accuses local firm of bilking investors out of $1.7M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A local investment firm accused of bilking clients out of more than $1.7 million is the target of a civil lawsuit filed Monday by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Rykoworks Capital Group LLC in Brownsburg and its owner, Ryan W. Koester, 40, are named in the suit, in addition to Trafalgar insurance salesman Rudolf D. Pameijer, 61, and his daughter Lindsay R. Sayer, 32.

Without admitting or denying the allegations, Pameijer and Sayer already have agreed to waive their right to a jury trial and entered into a settlement that permanently prevents them from providing investment advice in the future. They also could be ordered to repay victims with additional civil penalties.

The SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis accuses the trio of committing securities fraud by misappropriating investor funds for their personal use. Pameijer used the money for luxury automobiles, a motorcycle, a 30-foot boat, his son’s college tuition, a car for Sayer and various home renovations, the suit said. It said he also used funds to pay for Sayer's wedding and her honeymoon in St. Lucia.

The suit stems from an investigation by the Indiana Secretary of State's office in which Rykoworks and Pameijer's Plan America LLC in Indianapolis had their assets frozen.

Koester, Pameijer and Sayer were not licensed to provide investment advice or to sell securities in Indiana, the securities division said.

The SEC alleges that the scheme began when Pameijer, a career insurance salesman, met Koester at a marketing event in October 2009. At the event, Koester held himself out as an expert foreign currency trader, prompting Pameijer to ultimately enter into a profit-sharing agreement with Koester for clients Pameijer brought to Rykoworks.

Pameijer and Sayer began soliciting clients in October 2010 to invest with Rykoworks through promissory notes that purported to guarantee 12-percent returns, the lawsuit claims.

“Many of the investors were unsophisticated,” the complaint said, “and some included friends and family of Pameijer.”

The largest defrauded investors were a retired scrap metal worker and his wife, who gave Pameijer $1.1 million, the complaint said.

Pameijer and Sayer transferred remaining investor funds that they did not misappropriate to Koester and Rykoworks, which Koester depleted through trading losses and personal expenses. Koester also misappropriated additional funds that he raised directly from investors, according to the SEC.

As part of the scheme, the trio provided false account statements and information to investors, the suit said.

By fall 2011, Pameijer urgently sought to raise additional funds from new investors. But Koester eventually became unresponsive to Pameijer, and Pameijer told clients that Koester had absconded with their funds, the complaint alleges.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • do your homework
    “Many of the investors were unsophisticated,” the complaint said, “and some included friends and family of Pameijer.” --------------- This quote says it all. Anyone that thinks 12 percent returns can be guaranteed is going to get whats coming to them. The SEC too often gives consumers a false sense of security. With bad apples like this advisor it gets more people thinking more regulation is the answer. All more regulation does is make people think they are safer while increasing costs and preventing good advisors from growing their business

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT