IBJNews

Senate budget pushes highway expansion, small tax cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers and Gov. Mike Pence drew closer to a budget compromise Thursday with the unveiling of a $30 billion Senate plan that cuts the state income tax by $150 million and establishes a new roads fund.

The Senate budget would keep much of the education spending House lawmakers wrote into the budget in February, but has sizable overhauls elsewhere — paying for an expansive statewide highway plan, curbing teacher pension debt and cutting a handful of taxes.

In adding at least a modest tax cut, Senate Republicans extended a hand to Pence, who has spent much of the last few months publicly and privately battling with House Republicans. Pence is pushing to cut the tax from 3.4 percent to 3.06 percent; the Senate budget lowers the tax to 3.3 percent.

"I am pleased with the latest version of the budget. I think we are getting on the same page but there are still details and differences in levels and priorities, and I believe those will be the subject of vigorous and respectful negotiations in the days to come," the governor said Thursday.

Senate Republicans proposed — on top of the personal income tax cut — decreasing the state's financial institutions tax by 2 percentage points and eliminating the inheritance tax, a measure already being slowly phased out.

"What we have is a mix of tax cuts, and I think we're more comfortable in the Senate with that broader package," said Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne.

Senate Democrats quickly pointed out that the income tax cut might sound large, but would work out to a savings of roughly a dollar a week for most residents.

"If it weren't so serious it would be a joke," said Sen. Lindel Hume, D-Princeton. "To have this reduction from 3.4 to 3.3 percent. I just feel most of the people in this state could care less about that dollar a week, we seriously need that money to fund this state."

Much of the budget debate this session has centered on how Indiana would use $2 billion in cash reserves and a roughly $500 million surplus. Pence submitted a budget in January that spent the vast majority of it on a 10-percent tax cut. But local leaders and school advocates pushed hard for the restoration of budget cuts that former Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels used to help build the state's coffers.

Senate Republicans' budget keeps a similar level of spending as laid out by House Republicans, but shifted spending in significant ways. Most noticeable: A plan that would put $200 million a year into a transportation fund dedicated to expanding Indiana's interstates.

IBJ reported Wednesday that Senate leaders were expected to push for more road-construction spending.

The money would be used to finance expansion of Interstate 65 and Interstate 70 to six lanes statewide and pay for another leg of the Interstate 69 extension. It would also pay for the Indiana Commerce Connector, an outer beltway which would stretch around central Indiana from Muncie to Martinsville.

There's no set timetable for when the lanes would be added or when work would begin on the commerce connector, Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said.

"If you don't make the commitment now, it will never happen," Kenley said.

The Senate plan also spends roughly $100 million more to pay down pension liabilities, including pension payments to teachers hired before 1996, a line item which could cost the state upward of $1 billion a year in a few years. Daniels dismissed the problem through his eight-year tenure, but lawmakers, including Kenley, pushed to invest more in the state's teacher pension stabilization fund.

The Senate also will require counties that don’t already have a wheel tax to adopt one before they can receive additional money. Most of Indiana’s urban and suburban counties charge a wheel tax.

The Appropriations Committee advanced the budget on a 9-4 party line vote Thursday. The budget now moves to the Senate and later will be hashed out in a conference committee with House negotiators.

House Ways and Means Chairman Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, said it was still too early to say exactly what the final product will look like, but it would be safe to bet on some tax cuts.

"I think very strongly there will, as this framework shows and our framework shows, there will be tax cuts. It's which tax cuts should be targeted and what's the impact" that must be decided, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Dinosaur hypocrite
    Kenley says if we don't expand and build new roads now, it'll never happen. But he says we're not ready to move forward on even allowing Marion & Hamilton counties to decide if they want to spend their own money on expanded transit. This is the type of leadership that keeps the brain drain moving at full speed.
  • Tax Reduction
    The proposed tax deduction, even the one proposed by Pence, is so pitiful as to be laughable. It will benefit the "wealthy" the most, not us middle class and poorer. Why not apply extra revenue to the pension fund!
  • Study it more
    The transportation funding obviously needs more study and should be put on the shelf...er, sent to a summer study committee...before that amount of money is committed. There are long-term concerns about the ability of the roads to pay for themselves once built. (Oh, wait. That only applies to PUBLIC transportation, not PUBLIC roads.)
  • Joke?
    Are you kidding me?!?! It has been noted by all political parties that we are in some kind of hole with our current roads and bridges and the state decides now is a good time to allocate additional funds for new highways and new lanes?!?! WAKE UP! Road building is a continuous hobby for the politically connected lobbyists. I still don't remember voting for this? $200 mil a year for highways. I guess we are much better off than we thought. Incomes are up, everyone loves taxes......YAY INDIANA!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT