IBJNews

NFP of NOTE: Sheltering Wings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Not-For-Profit of Note


Sheltering Wings

P.O. Box 92
Danville, IN 46122
Phone: (317) 745-1496
Fax: (317) 745-1497
Web site: www.shelteringwings.org
Founded: 1999
Paid employees: 30
Highest-paid staff member: Maria Larrison, CEO, $68,000
Top volunteers: Deb Wesolowski, administrative assistant, five years; Cheryll Forgue, administrative assistant, seven years

MISSION
                    
Sheltering Wings provides emergency housing for women and children suffering from any form of domestic abuse. We build stable and independent lives through essential programs offered in a supportive and Christ-centered environment.

MANAGEMENT

Maria Larrison, CEO
Michael Garrett, chief development officer
Linda Wells, residential services manager
Andrea Crozier, children's coordinator
Mary Williams, director of marketing and business development

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Dan Bond, chairman
Dave Blanford, vice chairman
David Clark, treasurer
Deanna Sanders, secretary
Bobbi Drury
Paul Hardin
Dave Helm
Dawn Harvey Horth
Greg Hylton
Cindy Leffler
Robert Leonard

PROGRAMS

Children's Life Skills: Children learn about healthy relationships, understanding their emotions, safe baby-sitting, cooking,
                     laundry, Internet safety and first aid.

Women's Life Skills: Women learn about healthy relationships, co-dependency, parenting,
                     job interviewing, resume writing, budgeting, first aid, self-defense, and many other skills for independent living.

Strides to Success: an equine therapeutic program that teaches the ladies about boundaries, self-awareness and self-esteem

Fund-Raiser
                 
The Brownsburg Sertoma Club's annual St. Valentine's Dinner Dance raised $81,000 in 2009.

 FINANCIAL PROFILE
                    
2007 income: $1,252,494
2007 expenses: $1,144,749
2007 assets: $1,590,287

2008 projected income: $1,102,585
2008 projected expenses: $1,095,448
Fiscal year begins: Jan. 1

2008 income

 Government: 23 percent
United Way: 21 percent
In-kind: 16 percent
Foundations: 12 percent
Corporations: 11 percent
Churches: 9 percent
Other: 8 percent

 

2008 expenses


Life skills and mentoring: 30 percent
Crisis Intervention: 30 percent
Children's Programs: 21 percent
Prevention, education, outreach: 16 percent
Administrative: 3 percent

___

Information was provided by Sheltering Wings. Profiled organizations must be based in or serve the Indianapolis area, have Internal Revenue Service tax-exempt status, and must be willing to provide IBJ with detailed financial information.
                                   
                 
                 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT