IBJNews

Simon daughter questions using father's estate to pay donations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Melvin Simon’s daughter Deborah suggests in court papers that her stepmother Bren is trying to pawn off to her late husband’s estate responsibility for millions of dollars in charitable contributions that should be paid by Bren-affiliated foundations and trusts.

The dispute surfaced after attorneys for Bren, who oversees a trust holding Melvin’s assets, sought court guidance last month on whether the estate should fulfill major charitable pledges while a legal fight over the fortune continues.

Bren’s filing lists pledges to Indiana University, Riley Children’s Foundation, St. Vincent Foundation and the Indianapolis Museum of Art.

In a Feb. 26 response, attorneys for Deborah favor going ahead and paying this year’s charitable commitments that are the responsibility of the estate. But they say the St. Vincent and IMA pledges are not.

Court records show that in March 2007, Melvin and Bren, as co-trustees of the Joshua Max Simon Foundation, pledged a total of $2.4 million—$400,000 annually for six years—to complete and furnish the St. Vincent Primary Care Center on 86th Street. The center was renamed in honor of the couple’s deceased son.

A month later, the couple pledged $10 million to the IMA to endow the museum’s director and CEO. Court records say $5 million was to come from the Melvin and Bren Simon Charitable Foundation No. 1, with $500,000 paid annually for 10 years. The other half was to be paid from a Bren Simon trust after her death.

 “While it is Deborah’s sincere hope that these foundations and Bren ... satisfy these commitments, Melvin, his estate and [his trust] were not parties to the IMA or St. Vincent agreements,” attorneys for Deborah Simon said in a filing.

“Given their plain language, Deborah does not understand why Bren would put at issue whether these pledge agreements should be satisfied” out of estate assets.

Attorneys for Bren could not be reached for comment.

Bren, 66, and Deborah have been battling in court since January, when Deborah filed litigation contesting changes in the will that Melvin executed in February 2009—seven months before he died at age 82.

The changes boosted the portion of Melvin’s estate going directly to Bren from one-third to one-half. They also wiped out the portion that was to go to Deborah and her two siblings from Melvin’s first marriage—Cynthia Simon-Skjodt and David Simon, the chairman and CEO of Simon Property Group.

Deborah contends Melvin was suffering from dementia and even needed help signing his name. Bren, who married Melvin in 1972, asserts the changes reflected Melvin’s wishes, and he understood what he was doing. She acknowledges he needed help with his signature but attributed that to "Parkinsonian symptoms" affecting his right hand.

The skirmish over charitable gifts is the latest twist in an escalating battle over an estate that could be worth $2 billion.

Melvin, co-founder of Simon Property Group, announced giant donations during the final years of his life.

In December 2006, Melvin and Bren announced they were giving $25 million to IU to create the Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center and another $25 million to fund a faculty and research endowment. The agreement stipulates that a Simon foundation pay $4 million a year toward the gifts until Melvin’s death, at which time obligations shift to the estate.

The next year, Simon family members announced $40 million in gifts toward completion of a 10-story inpatient tower at Riley Hospital for Children. A Melvin and Bren Simon foundation committed $5 million, and Melvin agreed to pay another $12.5 million in  eight annual installments of $1.56 million. That agreement also stipulates that the expense becomes part of his estate.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Legal Obligations
    Did we read the same article? Do you honestly believe that pledged donations given to IU, Clarian etc. can now be ignored with the appearance of a 'new' will? Mr. Simon obviously spent a lifetime donating to his favorite charities and his estate planning, prior to the 'new' will, reflected that. Maybe you are trying to say that Mr. Simon no longer cared about these charities but instead you chose to attack his daughter.You don't sound like an 'uninterested bystander' you sound like someone with an agenda. The only reason that the other daughter is mentioned as being adopted is to point out that her mother, Bren, will probably leave her inheritance to her only living child. But it does beg the question as to what happened to her father and why it would be necessary to adopt her when she's 40 years old. At any rate, the legal obligations made towards the charities should be honored and if you think that Mrs. Simon should ignore these obligations, then, you are as morally bankrupt as she is.
  • to Debbie
    It was your dad's money, NOT YOURS. If he wants to leave it to Bren, or to his dog or to anyone but you that was his choice

    And, what was this crap about the "simon children and tammy?" tammy was adopted and that makes her, like it or not, your sister. Your Dad, who was an AMAZING man, would be rolling over in his grave. Too bad he didn't videotape this so you could see for yourself what his opinion of you apparently is, since you can't seem to see how loudly the provisions of his will speak.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT