IBJNews

Simon posts strong quarter as mall occupancy strengthens

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. shopping-mall owner, reported an 8.1-percent increase in fourth-quarter funds from operations as retailer demand for space in outlet centers climbed.

FFO, which gauges a property company’s ability to generate cash, rose to $894.8 million, or $2.47 a share, from $827.4 million, or $2.29, a year earlier, the Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust said Friday morning.

The average of 22 analyst estimates was $2.43 a share, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Simon declared a $1.25 per share dividend, up from $1.20 for the previous three months and 8.7 percent more than a year earlier.

Simon is benefiting as retailers seek space in outlet centers, where brand-name items are sold at a discount.

Overall, occupancy in its malls climbed to 96.1 percent in December from 95.3 percent at the end of 2012 as total sales per square foot increased from $568 to $582. Rents also grew, to $42.34 per square foot in the fourth quarter from $40.73 in the year-ago period.

Profit increased 21 percent, to $381.6 million, or $1.23 per share, compared with $315.4 million, or $1.01 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2012.

Quarterly revenue rose 5 percent, to $1.4 billion.

“This was an excellent quarter and year for Simon Property Group, capped off by our 20th anniversary as a public company in December,” Simon CEO David Simon said in a prepared statement. “We produced strong financial and operating results in the fourth quarter, led by 5.5-percent growth in comparable property net operating income for our U.S. malls and premium outlets."

For the entire year, Simon reported FFO of $3.2 billion, or $8.85 per share, compared with $2.9 billion, or $7.98 per share, in 2012. The company forecast 2014 FFO per share in the range of $9.50 to $9.60.

Net income in 2013 fell slightly, to $1.3 billion, or $4.24 per share, compared with $1.4 billion,  or $4.72, in the prior year. Results for 2012 include non-cash net gains from acquisitions and dispositions of $1.41 per share.

Revenue in 2013 grew 5.9 percent, to $5.2 billion.

In December, Simon announced that it will spin off all of its strip centers and 44 smaller malls into a separate public company. The transaction should be completed in the second quarter, Simon said.

Simon shares rose 2.9 percent in premarket trading, to $155 each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Repay the people
    Well now Simon can repay Indianapolis the 400 million we have given them for the Circle Center Mall

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT