IBJNews

Simon’s Rushmore Mall loan sent to servicer, Fitch says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A loan on a South Dakota shopping center owned by Simon Property Group Inc., the biggest U.S. real estate investment trust, was sent to a special servicer because default is imminent, Fitch Ratings said.

The balance of the debt on the Rushmore Mall in Rapid City is $94 million, Fitch said Tuesday. The 830,000-square-foot center was built in 1978 and renovated in 1993, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

The mall plunged in value after the 2008 financial crisis. It had an appraised value of $117.5 million in 2006 as the commercial property market was peaking and was appraised at $45 million in September 2011, according to Bloomberg data. Sears Holdings Corp. and J.C. Penney Co. are among the property’s anchor tenants, according to Simon’s website.

But Penny, which occupies 89,000 square feet, has threatened to leave the mall unless it receives a new 104,000-square-foot space at the mall. Simon has denied that request.

Simon’s revenue has been rising as demand for space in regional malls climbs. Revenue jumped 14 percent in the third quarter from a year earlier, the Indianapolis-based company reported.

Les Morris, a Simon spokesman, didn’t immediately return a voice mail or e-mail seeking comment on the Fitch listing.

Special servicers negotiate with landlords on behalf of bond investors. The Rushmore Mall loan is packaged within Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc. 2006-3, a commercial mortgage-backed security.

Simon owns or has stakes in 331 properties in North America and Asia.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT